Forum4

Forum4 => New age myths => Topic started by: Mr X on 19 July 2014 05:10:48 AM

Title: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 19 July 2014 05:10:48 AM
hello you,

to combine two threads i have thinking about, i am curious about two things, like an cat.

is there anything at all to suggest that carlos castaneda was anything other than an fraud who ended up being an cultie.

i like the train of thought of "so he was an fraud but why did he gather those particular concepts, what was the system he tried to make from other peoples stuff, what was the point trying to be achieved".

although generally speaking, i also do like the shallow approach - if you want to debunk carlos castaneda, just read his books. do you really think it is possible for people to do the magical things in those books, do you really belief an ancient shaman can dissapear into an inorganic dimension then return and become an nazgul vampire. can an car be moved by magic. for anyone who is reasonable it is easy to just say no.

the other thing i wonder aboot, and am combining with this thread to avoid making 2 useless threads, is - what did sustained reaction do wrong, how did it go so bad.

this is purely for wonder. i only have minor problems with how sustained reaction debunked castaneda, but otherwise i think they successfully did debunker castaneda. there does however seem to be and schizm.

i think there is something to be found in the examination of beliefers and non beliefers discussing things. something that sustained reaction had for an time. but then they lost it, and it seems "it" will never be recovered. not there, not here, not anywhere else.

what went wrong ? exactly.

that are my questions for this thread, born of curiously,

is there any value in castaneda, at all ? is there any value in the systems castaneda stole from, or any new age system ?

what went wrong at sustained reaction that made beliefers choose to stop interacting with skeptics ?

mr x .


Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 02 September 2014 04:26:27 PM

Hmmm... no replies to this entertainingly provocative post.  I think that talking in terms of an ancient shaman disappearing into an inorganic dimension then returning and becoming a "nazgul vampire" could tend to put believers off from replying.

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 13 October 2014 12:27:09 PM
was there anything i said that was wrong.

i think i describe the situation to be accurate.

if you are to belief in doctor castaneda stories of cliff jumpers, you are to acknowledge the story of the interdimensonal nazpire.

if you are to think there is no such thing as an nazpire, you must explain the criteria of youre cherry picking.

there is also the questions of where did sustained reactions go wrong. i would say treating people as unworthy of voicing their voice is one of them.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 14 October 2014 10:14:18 AM
Well you say "cherry picking" but there is a good rationale for treating Castaneda's first three books differently from the subsequent ones.

In his interview with Time (March 1973) shortly after he had published his third book,

"Now I'm at the edge, and I have to change my whole format.  Writing to get my Ph.D. was my accomplishment, my sorcery, and now I am at the apex of a cycle that includes the notoriety.  But this is the last thing I will ever write about Don Juan."

The "whole format" did indeed change after that ... not sharply and suddenly, since the first half of his fourth book is fairly similar in tone to his third ... but increasingly and definitely.

You mention "interdimensional nazpire" and I think that tracking occurrences of the word "dimension" in the books, and the increasingly odd ways in which it is used, would be a good marker for how Castaneda's change of format developed.

If we grep through the online versions of the books for the character string 'dimension':

in the first book TTodJ it does not occur at all;

in the second book ASR it occurs once, but in a reasonably ordinary sense: "When I moved my eyes away from his face and looked at it with the corner of my eye, so to speak, I could perceive his solidity; that is to say, I could perceive a three-dimensional person; without really looking at him I could, in fact, perceive his whole body, but when I focused my gaze, the face became at once the luminous object."

in the third book J2I it does not occur at all;

in the fourth book ToP it occurs twice; first, early in the book, in the ordinary sense, "Although I had no criteria to judge dimensions, I had had the feeling that it was about a foot long"; but the second time, near the end of the book, we have "Don Juan's voice brought forth another dimension to my state of being at that moment."

After that, dimensionality takes wing.

In TEG for example, "The sound of her voice seemed to act for me as a conduit into another dimension, another kind of time" and "Through the exercise of the third not-doing, Silvio Manuel gave a new dimension to our perception of the world around us" and even, "She said that a part of her last-minute instruction was to make me enter into the second attention as stalkers do, and that dona Soledad was more capable than she herself was to usher me into the stalker's dimension."

In TAoD, "the total mood of the dream changed and I would find myself in a dimension unknown to me" ... "the bluish blob of energy was from a dimension entirely different from ours" ... "He and his party were going to fulfill the sorcerers' dream of leaving this world and entering into inconceivable dimensions".

My guess would be that don Juan never actually used the word 'dimension' or its Spanish equivalent, and that where it occurs, it is Castaneda's invention.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 20 October 2014 11:28:02 AM
Also consider, (Castaneda interview in Uno Mismo, 1997)
Quote
As far as I know, nothing of what don Juan taught us seems to have a counterpart in Western knowledge. Once, when don Juan was still here, I spent a whole year in search of gurus, teachers and wise men to give me an inkling of what they were doing. I wanted to know if there was something in the world of that time similar to what don Juan said and did. My resources were very limited and they only took me to meet the established masters who had millions of followers and, unfortunately, I couldn't find any similarity.

I think a year's immersion would have had a marked and difficult-to-undo effect on the vocabulary he used for talking about things.

*edit* I mean, regardless of if he actually found any correlations.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 20 October 2014 08:22:28 PM
hello there mr ju4o,

"My guess would be that don Juan never actually used the word 'dimension' ' - j40

suggests dong juan exists, if you want to get caught up on words. you guess he didnt' use the word, or you guess he existes and didnt use the word. interested. cudos on use of the word grep.

i did with greatness enjoy the analysis you gave to the words, i have not seen such nice and easy castanalysis before, very well done, modern style.

when i said cherry pickings, i did not mean seperating the books. but i am aware that that is and thing people do. i can understand that some people prefer the shaman
side of things rather than the assembly point and nazpire cosmology.
shamans are cool, being part of the world but not part of it, looking inwards at the world and judging it
, looking outwards from the world to find solutions or anything, trying to communicate with the world in order to be part of it.
i already have an angle on some black market chinese peyote buttons incase i decide shamanisim to be the optimal path.

i wouldnt say picking the first few books from the other few books to be cherry picking. that is an different story. i would say modern total belifers do however cherry pick from all the books. it has been some time since i have tracked modern online toltecism, but i do remember the nazpire is part of the modern culture. even that ultra-douche, lujan, made it part of his shtick.

i can understand that you are saying as castanedas started making it up, he started using words his supposed intial informant would not of used. if the intial informant existed.

what happens if we change the word dimension to "other worlds, realms, perceptions, assembly positions".

if an nazpire were to be from an different dimension, or and different world, or an inorganic realm, does it make any difference ? it is still an nazpire. if total belifers belif in the total story, the nazpire is part of it. if that part is silly, but the rest is right, cherry picking is taking place. that requires to be explain.the explanation will always fall short due to the cherrys being from an tree that also grew nazpires.

explain to me how i am wrong. how can the branches of a tree not be bound by the trunk. how is the trunk not bound by the  branches.

mr x.

ps.
regarding the second post. i like that. but i strongly disagree about the difficult to undo thing. try it for yourself, it is not hard in infiltrate any number of cults without buying into it in any significant way. if, however, and person bought into whatever, then yes that would strongly infuence their speaking words, no doubt.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 21 October 2014 05:45:53 PM
"if ... part is silly, but the rest is right, cherry picking is taking place. that requires to be explain.the explanation will always fall short due to the cherrys being from an tree that also grew nazpires."

Why will the explanation always fall short?  I think sometimes the explanation can hit the mark exactly.

For example, here is an explanation of why Castaneda went off the rails soon after don Juan died.

The explanation is that he went off the rails because don Juan died.

Succinct and compelling.  In my opinion of course.  And, as you say, that is if don Juan existed in the first place.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 23 October 2014 11:33:26 AM

"there is also the questions of where did sustained reactions go wrong."

I have been thinking about that.  I think a key thing which made SR special was when there were a good number of people who hadn't made their minds up.  That isn't the only thing required for a forum to be good, but it is one of the main things.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 06 November 2014 12:06:45 PM
part 1 -

in the realm where dong guam is real and existed, in the realm where he exisited, every statement of 'don juan said this' can logically be followed by "and he belifed nazpires are real'

that is why the explanation always fall short, assuming belief is being done by total beliefers. if the total beliefers say one thing is true, they are also saying the rest of it is true. does even the most liberal middle grounder think all carlos storys are true, no.

in anti toltec lore, the nazpire is an central part of it, the central way of controlling other toltecs. i find it easiest to debunk the existance of the such and incredibly outlandish idea in order to dismiss the rest of the argument. =you think nazpire is real = everything else you say is invalid=

i find there to be nothing succuicnt or compelling about what you said. did he lose his rails because don juan died and left him alone and scared, did he lose his rails because don juan died when he wasnt meant to die but to instead achieve total freedom, breaking the ilusion in the way casta did when he himself died, did he lose his rails because the figure he made up was no more and now he had to compensate with newly fake storys to keep his career going, forcing him to branch off into made up crazy storys such as the assembly position. if we remove the idea that don juan was real, we need to restart the converstation.

i could go on. that does not suggest succinctness.

part 2

that does do seem to be an problem with the modern world. you think of something you dont know, you google on your phone, you now know, the world ends there.

when you and others started at sustained rection, it was still fresh, new, exciting. these days, i thinks, the true  beliefers wouldnt possible care to interact. the enhancers, the ones who who use casta to add to their life, dont want to hear why they are wrong. the non beliefer dont care because they have all the info from wiki, it would be like joining an forum to discuss why orange is the worst of the colours.

those that have not made up their minds, as intersteresring as they might be, i imagine they would be hard to find, and hard to entice. i do agree that they would be essential.

i do not think it is unreasoable to say - we cant recreate what made sr special.

however histroy does repeat it self.

who knows.

i dont know.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 06 November 2014 02:22:27 PM
Quote
did he lose his rails because don juan died and left him alone and scared, did he lose his rails because don juan died when he wasnt meant to die but to instead achieve total freedom, breaking the ilusion in the way casta did when he himself died, did he lose his rails because the figure he made up was no more and now he had to compensate with newly fake storys to keep his career going, forcing him to branch off into made up crazy storys such as the assembly position ... i could go on. that does not suggest succinctness.

Well yes that makes it less succinct but those are alternative amplifications of the same basic idea.

It's only the basic idea (that CC went off the rails because dJ died) which is succinct.  As for which amplification is right, my guess is that he fell prey to the second enemy of the man of knowledge (clarity) but that is only a guess.

Quote
That clarity of mind, which is so hard to obtain, dispels fear, but also blinds.

'It forces the man never to doubt himself. It gives him the assurance he can do anything he pleases, for he sees clearly into everything. And he is courageous because he is clear, and he stops at nothing because he is clear. But all that is a mistake; it is like something incomplete. If the man yields to this make-believe power, he has succumbed to his second enemy and will fumble with learning. He will rush when he should be patient, or he will be patient when he should rush. And he will fumble with learning until he winds up incapable of learning anything more.'

'What becomes of a man who is defeated in that way, don Juan? Does he die as a result?'

'No, he doesn't die. His second enemy has just stopped him cold from trying to become a man of knowledge; instead, the man may turn into a buoyant warrior, or a clown. Yet the clarity for which he has paid so dearly will never change to darkness and fear again. He will be clear as long as he lives, but he will no longer learn, or yearn for, anything.'

That seems to describe pretty well the Carlos of the subsequent decades and dJ would never have allowed it.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 08 November 2014 06:20:06 AM
I'm still around, gents. I'm just not feeling very talky, I'll read your posts with interest.

 ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6ljFaKRTrI
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 08 November 2014 04:34:33 PM
yes it does make it less succint. and yes i guess the basic idea is succinct. still does not seem very succinct though, but lets not get caught up in semetics.

you guess is, in translation, you belief there are enemys of mankind, as casta described, and casta fell prey to (because you guess the universe is predatorial). you guess don juan was real, and casta fell in one of the real pitfalls he did speak of.

you could also guess don juan wasnt real, casta got caught up in narcisistic culty behaviour, the end. no philospophy or extra thought required. but you guess man of knowing stuff is real. not that there is anything wrong with that, but in terms of people making their minds up can we say you are and somewhat beliefer, you lean towards it being real pre (im guessing) tales of power.

so that would mean you think don jian was real and casta went of the rails due to his death or dissappearance. he ran out of orginal source material and starterd fabrication ?

the fear clarity power knowledge things is interested. i do wonder, within his own context, if was not power that got him. its is commonly thought that that system stacks isnt it ? like you dont lose fear and gain clarity, you gain clairity and conquer fear. it is not an clean cut transistion. it would be easy to argue casta gained power in the real world.

mr x.

hello mr g,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDAFivGsKX4
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 08 November 2014 05:47:59 PM
"so that would mean you think don jian was real and casta went of the rails due to his death or dissappearance. he ran out of orginal source material and starterd fabrication ?"

No he went off the rails because without the guidance of dJ he fell prey to the second enemy of man of knowledge.  If dJ hadn't died then Casta would've had more of a chance.

Hi G.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 09 November 2014 09:05:25 PM
G your reappearance has again been synchronous with something curious in the forum.

Since yesterday something has been buzzing in the back of my mind and making me feel that there's been something in this thread I should have noticed and didn't notice.  This evening I re-read the thread and found where it says

"the fear clarity power knowledge things is interested."

and that brings up a curious memory.

Once in these forums somebody listed the four enemies of the man of knowledge as fear, clarity, power and knowledge.

Which was queried, since in the famous passage in TTodJ the fourth enemy is given as old age.

The poster replied that in the text of TTodJ which they had, and which they gave the publisher and date of, the four enemies are fear, clarity, power and knowledge.

I found that really surprising.  Had the publisher made a mistake?  It seemed unlikely.  But it seemed even more unlikely that the publisher, or even the author himself, would have lost courage and amended the text deliberately.

It wasn't at all easy to get hold of the particular edition which the poster specified, but eventually I did, and opened it at the passage which talks about the four enemies.

Well, the text was exactly the same as in all the other editions that I knew of.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 12 November 2014 06:00:33 PM
it is curious. could you give more details on the person who claim it was in the books and what edition ? some more context.

perhaps it becuase there is fear/not fear, clarity - acting or not acting at the right times, power - using or not using at right times, old age - man of knowledge or not man of knowledge.
there is an duality in both enemies, the last one is associated with the man of knowledge. for my use of it, thats just how i think of it, when i do think of it. it has been

claiming casta fell prey to the second enemy of the people on the path of the men of knowledge, is saying there are men of knowledge, there is an path, there is an don juan. that is an lot to add onto the idea that one single human being became corrupted.

shirley it is easier, more straightfoward, and more likely, that he went of the rails for other, more human flaw type of reasons.

if don juan was real for an time, who taught him, julian ? it is an lot to say.

mr x.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtrEN-YKLBM
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 12 November 2014 10:56:02 PM
"... there is an path, ..."

Well, I'm not just saying there is a path.  Probably there are millions, and dJ (if he existed) outlined one of them.  Hopefully one with heart.

Likewise there are probably millions of enemies along these paths and dJ (if he existed) described four.

As for which particular enemy (or enemies) Castaneda fell prey to ... or if indeed he fell prey at all ... I'm simply saying what I think most likely.  I'm giving this as an example of a complete explanation, in response to your earlier remark that "the explanation will always fall short due to the cherrys being from an tree that also grew nazpires".  The explanation I'm suggesting explains everything, i.e. it explains how the earlier books seem like an attempt to present a hard-to-understand world view which he encountered while doing field work in Mexico, while the later books seem too phantasmagoric to take seriously as possible reportage.

"Nazpires" belong to the later books, and when you say "if don juan was real for an time, who taught him, julian ?" bear in mind that Julian is first mentioned in TFfW (a very late book).
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 14 November 2014 07:21:15 PM
hello there mr j,

paths, to what exactly. millions of paths leading to where ? no where ? why 'hopefully' one with heart, what does that matter. we are meatbags on an speck of dust in space, why does heart matter, where does an path lead.

millions of enemies, but you say casta just casually and conveniently fell to an pitfall he himself coined. the majestic and deep idea of 'clarity'. not the common and normal enemie of 'wanted power money sex and drugs, had and imagination'. which one is more likey.

if you are going to make an complete explainer, i suggest you do that. write and essay if you have to, i will read it. but to say it and complete explainer because the early books were good and the later books bad, says nothing. it just sets us back at square one. if the complete total explanation is 'he was reporting and real but hard to understand world, then he went of the rails', the first question is 'what culture was the source of the intial information, what was he reporting about, what is the name of the hard to understand world view, where did the informant learn it from'. if the first reaction is to look for the missing peices, then it is not complete.

i do appreciate the idea of an 'complete explantion', dont get me wrong, it is an nice idea for presenting an viewpoint. julian being from later books doesnt really matter, what matters is, if you think the early stuff was real, what is it, where is it from, what is the point of it. where extactly is the cut off point of it being real before it becomes fantasy.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 15 November 2014 05:54:37 PM
Not sure if the exact cut off point matters.  I think there was a marked but gradual loss of believability round about the time that Castaneda said he was going to change his 'format' and I wouldn't pin it down to an exact point.

Questions about cultural source are interesting, or would be if there was any way of addressing them.  Which I think there aren't, in the case of Castaneda.  There could have been, back then in the 60s and 70s, people could have put him on the spot more.

These days anthropologists tend to accuse Castaneda (if they mention him at all) of misrepresenting the Yaquis.

My question to them is, looking at the content of his books instead of just their titles, where is he actually doing this (misrepresenting the Yaquis).

Quote
The friend who had introduced me to don Juan explained later that the old man was not a native of Arizona, where we met, but was a Yaqui Indian from Sonora, Mexico.

At first I saw don Juan simply as a rather peculiar man who knew a great deal about peyote and who spoke Spanish remarkably well. But the people with whom he lived believed that he had some sort of 'secret knowledge', that he was a 'brujo'. The Spanish word brujo means, in English, medicine man, curer, witch, sorcerer. It connotes essentially a person who has extraordinary, and usually evil, powers.

I had known don Juan for a whole year before he took me into his confidence. One day he explained that he possessed a certain knowledge that he had learned from a teacher, a 'benefactor' as he called him, who had directed him in a kind of apprenticeship. Don Juan had, in turn, chosen me to serve as his apprentice, but he warned me that I would have to make a very deep commitment and that the training was long and arduous.

I think there is nothing in any of the books which tie this in to Yaqui culture.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 15 November 2014 06:10:39 PM
Here is a typical example,

Quote
A seeker meets an ancient Yaqui shaman named Don Juan Matus in the desert. Mystical truth is shown to the hero through hallucinogenic drugs. And the mysteries of the universe are revealed.

What a trip.

Too bad it probably never happened. Not the drug part, anyway.

So says David Delgado Shorter, associate professor in UCLA's Department of World Arts and Cultures, about the generation-defining, bestselling, iconic -- and controversial -- stories by Carlos Castaneda '62, M.A. '64, Ph.D. '73.

Castaneda's books have sold 8 million copies in 17 languages since The Teachings of Don Juan was first published in 1968. But they spawned a firestorm of protest and criticism because of discrepancies, inaccuracies and other suspicions of exactly when, where and how Castaneda learned of the information in his books.

That's what Shorter suspects may have happened with the nonexistent Yaqui drug connection.

"Castaneda's books became benchmarks of New Age thinking and his representations fueled critiques about the way anthropologists and New Ageists link native people with drug culture," he notes. "The Yaqui are fascinating because they were the alternative way of understanding the world at a moment when there was a general suspicion of the government and the Western way of being ... but no psychotropic plants are indigenous to Yaqui areas."

Shorter grew up close to and among native people in New Mexico and has lived with the Yaqui (or Yoeme, as they call themselves) off and on for 15 years. He also is the author of a book about the Yaqui's way of knowledge, the recently published We Shall Dance Our Truth. And he underscores that while the drug link is unfortunate as well as inaccurate, there is, in truth, much to admire about Yoeme ideas about life.

"They maintain active relationships with plants, animals and the land in a way that's inseparable from how they know themselves," Shorter explains. "We Shall Dance Our Truth is primarily about that way of knowing the world. Academically, it's about understanding how that way of knowing the world affects how you represent yourself to others."

In fact, how "the other" is represented in general in American society is a keen interest of the Bruin scholar. At UCLA, he also teaches a course on aliens, psychics and ghosts.

"The way people think about ancient cultures is the same way they think about the future, and myths, other times and other spaces," Shorter concludes. "They are all easily misrepresented as well."

Far out, indeed.

http://magazine.ucla.edu/depts/quicktakes/the_dancing_truth/ (http://magazine.ucla.edu/depts/quicktakes/the_dancing_truth/)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 17 November 2014 08:15:36 PM
yes i agree, even as an skeptic, that casta should not be related to yaqui culture.

its is dumb and ingenuous for even professionals such as antro pologist, to go down that road.

the second quote sounds sanchez like, 'he was wrong, but i am right'. which is acceptable and fair, for them to want to describe their actual dealings with an culture, but referencing casta at all seems dumb.

the cut off point certainly would be valuable information in the scenario where some of it is true.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 18 November 2014 01:09:21 PM
"the cut off point certainly would be valuable information in the scenario where some of it is true."

(http://zeta.forum4.org/pix/piegan.jpg)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 18 November 2014 08:23:29 PM
Well perhaps after developing the negative and noticing the clock, he could have gone back and photographed the scene without the clock.  But that seems excessive.  Anyway, here are 4 possible scenarios:

S1: publish the original photo (with clock).

S2: publish the doctored photo (as he actually did).

S3: go back, re-photograph without clock, and publish the result.

S4: not publish.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 24 November 2014 03:25:54 AM
the difference between knowing the cut off point is black and white or sepia. or and clock. i admint i dont get it. could you dumb it down and notch.

the cut off point remains as mattering. should one reduce self importance and then jump of an cliff, or should one not. where does the realness end.

mr x.

mr g, just saying,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41Y8t1IBTlA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzCEdSKMkdU
both to be watched in hd, it is glorious, i am happy.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 24 November 2014 08:29:23 PM
It's just that I think that knowing the exact cut off point wouldn't tell us anything much, with any reasonable degree of confidence, about reality.

For example, suppose that in some way we discovered that the first x books (for some value of x) were honest reportage and the subsequent books were fakes.

Well, even if everything that happened in the first x books really did appear to Carlos to happen ... it could still be the case (and I would imagine that a materialist would argue that it must have been the case) that everything of an apparently outlandish nature was simply the result of hallucinogenic ingestion.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 01 December 2014 08:52:23 AM
if on the morrow there was released an signed confession by casta saying the exact cut off. it would be interested.

"it was all real until i first used the word toltec to describe my informants world view, i came up with toltec while pooping after eating some spicy empanadas and went with that"

there would be, as and example, value in that. in that we could witness the mental gymnastics performed by all the beliefers who claimed he was right, and they turned an buck off of it.

what would the theun mares cult say when it is clear there are no toltecs. what would toltec eagle-scout miguel say.

for the average joe, if they want to belief in enemyes of man or drug fueled magic as their philosophy, there doesnt seem much harm in that. at least they dont subsribe to death for apostasy or other extreme beliefs. the exact cut off for them doesnt really matter, as even if there way of life view over extended into some magical thinking, the magic will never happen, and it wont hurt.

when people start selling and truth saying the magic, past cut off point ideas, there is and problem.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 01 December 2014 09:11:01 PM
I don't know anything about Theun Mares and when I google on the name it says "This site may be hacked" and

Quote
You'll see the message "This site may be hacked" when we believe a website may have been hacked. The hacker may have changed some of the existing pages on the site, or added new spam pages. If you visit the site, you may be redirected to spam or malware.

We recommend that you don't visit the website until this message disappears from the search result.

The other name you mention, I'm guessing you mean Miguel Ruiz.  According to his (hopefully non-hacked) website

Quote
Don Miguel Ruiz was born into a humble family with ancient traditions in rural Mexico, the youngest of 13 children. He considers himself very lucky, as this was where he learned from an early age that everything is possible, if we really want it.

His parents, Don Jose and Dona Sarita, as well as his grandfather, Don Leonardo, all believed that Miguel would continue their legacy in the centuries old Toltec tradition. Instead Don Miguel attended medical school, and became a surgeon.

For several years he practiced medicine with his brothers, and he realized that what needed to be healed was not only the physical brain, but the human mind as well.

A near fatal car accident changed the direction of Don Miguel's life. He experienced himself as pure awareness outside of the constraints of his physical body. He realized that the Toltec wisdom of his family contained all of the tools needed to change the human mind. Don Miguel promptly returned to his mother to finish his training and he became a Shaman.

So according to your scenario,

Quote
if on the morrow there was released an signed confession by casta saying the exact cut off. it would be interested.

"it was all real until i first used the word toltec to describe my informants world view, i came up with toltec while pooping after eating some spicy empanadas and went with that"

there would be, as and example, value in that. in that we could witness the mental gymnastics performed by all the beliefers who claimed he was right, and they turned an buck off of it.

what would the theun mares cult say when it is clear there are no toltecs. what would toltec eagle-scout miguel say.

I think that a "signed confession by casta" would have no effect at all on Miguel Ruiz's claims to authenticity since he would simply say, presumably, that his toltec roots come from or through his family.

So, at least so far as concerns Ruiz, you may not be correct in supposing that there would be interesting mental gymnastics ensuing upon a confession by casta saying he'd invented a toltec connection.

There is also Victor Sanchez (see Toltecs of the New Millennium, "Sanchez describes the Toltec tradition living on in the practice of contemporary indigenous people of Mexico") and I think that a signed confession by Casta would do nothing to undermine him either.

Actually on his website (hopefully also non-hacked) it is quite interesting:

Quote
Let's begin from the beginning. For ethnologists and historians, the Toltecs were the pre-Columbian Indian people that lived in central Mexico - mainly from 8th century to 12th century. Their capital city was Tula in the Mexican State of Hidalgo. After the 12th century, the Toltecs abandoned Tula; codices and registers from 16th century talk about the Toltec dispersion, supposedly related with the departure of their leader, Quetzalcoatl. One of the most interesting, found in the codices is the one that talks about Quetzalcoatl going to a cave under the Chapultepec Hill (in Mexico City), where he would enter into another dimension (Mictlan, Nahual or Omeyocan) and disappear forever. Anyway, what it clear, is that Toltecs did spread themselves in ancient Mexico influencing with their knowledge many other indigenous cultures, such as the Mayas. That is history.

The fact is: The Toltecs are considered the greatest civilizators of the past, not only nowadays but since the 16th century when the Aztec people were used to call "Toltec", a man of knowledge, as a resemblance of the great wisdom of the Ancient Toltecs, and the Toltequity to be the highest level of knowledge a human being can achieve.

For average people, the Toltecs were some kind of wise Indian people that disappeared many centuries ago. Since the Toltecs left so long ago, anyone can state whatever he or she wants about them... anyway, the Toltecs are not here to defend themselves, or at least it seems so...

Are they still here?

Maybe because Toltec Indians have no voice in the topics about Toltec Indian knowledge there is so much controversy among non-indian teachers of Toltec knowledge. But, there is one point that almost nobody is taking into account: there are indian communities in the present Mexico, preserving and keeping alive the practices of ancient Toltequity. That's what I have discovered, and that is the body of practices I am involved with, and from where I have taken the clues for making a practical and wise use of the proposals contained in the books of Carlos Castaneda. The way and techniques I have developed inspired by the writings of Castaneda, do not pretend to reflect the unworldly goals of Castaneda's tales, but those which are congruent with the Toltequity I have learned among the living Indian Toltecs in the Mexican mountains where they do live.

I have written the testimony of my experience among the surviving Toltecs in the book "Toltecs of the New Millennium". In that book, I have included many references, photos, official witnesses, etc., in order to let people know that what I am talking about is really happening in the same world in which they are living, because I think it is important for the reader to be sure that what he or she is reading, it is real... especially when this reader is looking for something to apply in his or her life, in the everyday world. It isn't my interest to criticize anybody, but this is my point of view and I just want to be clear about it.

The inheritors of the ancient Toltequity call themselves Wirrarika. Most of them speak only the Wirrarika language but some speak Spanish also. Even though they are more than 50,000, not all the members of the community share the same amount of knowledge related with their spiritual tradition.

Among the Wirrarika, there are special groups of people called Jicareros, which are the keepers of the ancient magical practices. They live levels of experience in the world of perception that the other members of the community can't even imagine.

The spanish word "Tradicion" (tradition, custom, etc.) doesn't mean for the Wirrarika people a body of beliefs, but a body of very efficient practices, oriented for the practitioner to achieve highest levels of awareness and perception.

Among the surviving Toltecs, the figure of the master, as we are used to think of in western and some non-western societies, doesn't exist. They are used to learning directly from "Spirit". The man of knowledge, the shaman is a mere vehicle that pushes the practitioner to look for the Spirit at the sacred places. There aren't books, there aren't formal teachings and there aren't human teachers. There are just sets of specific actions, which are the way to knock on the door of Spirit. If Spirit opens the door, the learning begins. You cannot just hear about "Usi" (Wirrarika word for Great Spirit), you must see it and hear it for yourself, without intermediaries. That's the way of the Toltec.

The surviving Toltecs are indians which are involved in their own world and they do not seem to be interested in the non-indian world. They are not interested in teaching or selling anything to us. They are only interested in surviving and keeping the Tradition alive, because it is their way to assume their own role as fields of energy, as real sons and daughters of the Sun, with the same nature as Great Father Sun and with the same love as Great Mother Earth.

I don't know how true or substantiable that is, but I would think that a "signed confession" by Casta wouldn't come anywhere close to being a problem.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 02 December 2014 11:28:28 AM
hello there mr j, nice post. thank you for that.

it appears that we disagree on this, in an good way. i think the exact cut off point of truth vs lies matters (in the imaginary scenario that anything casta said was true). i just do, no big deal. you dont think it matters. this is when other voices would be nice, what do people other than you and i think.

if the america government said one day "some of the offical informations about the moon landing is true, some of it isnt, you dont need the details because it doesnt matter", and person would want to know what was true and what wasnt. why would anyone not want to know the exact details of and interested story.

in this hyper thetical thing we are discussioning, where some of castas reportage was true, and the rest wasnt, the imaginary memoirs of casta called "a tale that is partly true" would matter, have and effect, and be an problem*.

it does bewilder me, on the casta centric forums, that someone could be interested in the casta mystery but not be aware at least in an cursory way of all the spin offs. i said it at sr multiple times.

you are an very smart person, an scholar of casta lore, the king of quotes references and citations. but you dont know anything about an strong casta spin off like mares. it is weird. i feel like we are on the verge of an orginal conversation, not the same old things rehashed, as looking at the full toltec picture also weirdly didnt happen at sr.

it is funny about the mares site, i always thought his cult would not go well after he died. he did have lots of websites, which one was hacked. mares used casta as and base and built and very imaginative world around it, was successful, formed and cult, did the whole cult compound and everything. you would probably like his stuff for the novelty alone. he was all about the 'toltec tradition', claiming casta was in contact with an real toltec, but then became and fraud. but used the intial casta as an example of legit toltecness. "a tale that is partly true" would put an frog in his sprocket.

but, and a big but, i agree that the confession proof wouldnt ultimately matter to him as and problem, or miguel, or victor. the default human position is to not belief in ultra magical toltecs, yet, people do. like anything new age or religious, and person can say and claim anything, with no proof whatsoever, and there will be dummys that will buy into it. they would still be able to run their businesses and make money off things that dont exist. but in the histroy books - the records of reality - things would be different.

and chunk of casta debunking is based of him taking ideas from other books that were published before he published the same ideas. that is accepted. why would people view miguel any different. all the other main toltecs only came out as toltecs after reading castas books. they can claim all day they knew about it before casta, but it doesnt make it so.

who cares if he claims he knew about toltecs all along, that means nothing. anyone can and does claim anything, doesnt even remotley make it true. he came out as an toltec after he read casta. 1, there was and guy who wrote about toltecs, and turned out to be and total fraud. 2 there was another guy who wrote about toltecs, after the first guy, but he is totally legit. yeah, no. the simple and most direct answer is miguel got his toltec ideas from casta books. very similar to casta getting ideas from other books.

this is where some good research comes in for finesse, there has to be and quote on record from miguel somewhere in time where he says what he thinks of casta. it would be intereseted.

sanchez, is he or has he ever been relevant ? he is and total true beliefer, he made money writing about casta path being real. he wanted to find the real toltecs, he made what he found into toltecs.
oh, toltecs are really called wirrarika, ok. not toltecs then ? oh ok. so they werent and super magical order that trancended the cultures they lived in, just an very findable bunch of mexicans. i actually have that new millieum book right here, but have never looked at it. he is just and nother beliefer that tried to find real toltecs, and forced the fantasy.

the eagle feather guy claimed don juan was real and he met him, wouldnt the casta confession present and problem to him ?

cleargreen claims don juan was real and the teach his teachings, wouldnt the casta confession present and problem to them ?

lujan claims to have interacted with casta story warriors and the tenant, wouldnt the casta confession present and problem to him ?

admintedly, non of them would acknowldge the confession, they would continue to be crazy, but if we could have an discussion with them in light of the confession, there would be mental gymnastics, no ?

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 03 December 2014 04:13:09 PM
"it does bewilder me, on the casta centric forums, that someone could be interested in the casta mystery but not be aware at least in an cursory way of all the spin offs. i said it at sr multiple times."

I think no need to be bewildered.  I didn't say I'm not aware of these people.  I surely am aware, "at least in a cursory way", of the people you have mentioned.  I have heard of Theun Mares, not least through your own posts on SR.  I even recall replying to several of your posts so probably I did google at least some of the people.  But I don't find any of them interesting, except for Sanchez.

I note your suggestion that I might find out more about Theun Mares:

Quote
you would probably like his stuff for the novelty alone. he was all about the 'toltec tradition', claiming casta was in contact with an real toltec, but then became and fraud. but used the intial casta as an example of legit toltecness.

So OK I have now had a look, as fortunately I have access to a browser specially hardened against possible malware.  It has the amusing side effect of making google speak German: "Diese Website wurde möglicherweise gehackt".  This seems quite suitable.  The whole subject is supposed to be about being a warrior and somehow it feels easier to be intrepid in German.

But, browsing around the various sites associated with his name, I can't seem to find a single interesting thing.  He doesn't even claim to have met a magician at a bus stop, but simply says

Quote
In 1977, Theun started to remember details of his training as a Toltec Warrior in previous lifetimes, and, as his memory of all his training was restored, he began to prepare for his work as a nagal (pronounced nah-hal). A nagal is traditionally a leader of a Toltec unit of warriors, and part of a nagal's duties involve leading his unit to freedom. Because of this, a nagal's work is normally never in the public eye.

However, although he prefers not to be in the public eye, times have changed and Theun's role now requires a higher profile. In addition to his private work of teaching personal apprentices, Theun's current work involves revealing the Toltec Teachings to the world through his books, as well as teaching more widely through his residential retreats.

Well, if he is saying that his training is based solely on memories recovered from previous lifetimes, how can it be of any interest?  Maybe he is leaving out some crucial details, but that also makes it not interesting.

This is probably a pretty boring post, at least I find it boring reading other people posting about how something does not interest them, and I try not to do it myself.  I am making an exception on this occasion.  I hope it helps you feel less bewildered.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 05 December 2014 02:55:17 PM
could you explain more why you find sanchez interseted ?

yes his claim is past life times, and the nazgul 'j". big claim, but at the same level of "my grandparents were toltecs, they are dead now you cant question them, they taught my mom, now i am a toltec".

i met someone at an bustop, is not that much different. just someone claiming something we cant verify.

maybe he is leaving out crucial details is and bit silly, of course he is, what new ager doesnt, i think an cursory awareness goes an bit further than that. how can it be of real interest - it was an casta based cult that gained and foothold in the minds of real human beings. people lives were effected by it. it was 100% tied up in and an result of carlos castaneda. how is that not interestering.

when i used to keep an eye on the various spin offs as part of this casta hobby, it took regular checks on the mares sites to see how things changed over time, such as the locations of the compounds, and the strength of the 'group belief'. i havent looked for and while, i imagine the network is dead.

i dont find any of them interested, i more find the whole casta thing interested, purely because it is ear marked as "potential supernatural". just that tiny remote chance there is some supernatural seed somewhere in it. aside from that, the way it turned culty and spawned alternative cults and people* bought into it, is also interested. the people beliefing in it is and very interested topic.

i appreciate these words -  But I don't find any of them interesting, except for Sanchez.

i personally prefer to look at the whole thing casta spawned including casta, sanchez was one of them even though i dont like him, so if you want to look into sanchez more, i have two of his books here, tell me why he doesnt suck.

ps. i thought you would like the mares novelty as its like don juan meets madame blavatsky.

mr x.

*casta readers who bought into secondary cults

** i admint in advance that sanchez has and nice mustache.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 05 December 2014 06:29:32 PM
"yes his claim is past life times, and the nazgul 'j". big claim, but at the same level of "my grandparents were toltecs, they are dead now you cant question them, they taught my mom, now i am a toltec"."

No these (the Mares claim and the Ruiz claim) are very different.

Although as I have mentioned I am not interested in either of them, I am interested in the way that their claims are different and am happy to talk more about that.

The key thing in the Ruiz claim is that it posits the continuing presence of toltec lineage in the community he was born into.  This is something that is checkable and verifiable.  Sure it could be very difficult to check and/or verify.  The community might be very secretive.  Overcoming that challenge is one of the most interesting things that anthropology is beginning to try to come to terms with.

Here is an example of how anthropologists are trying to learn how to be more sensitive, and thereby have a better chance of studying indigenous wisdom, from the already mentioned yaqui expert now at UCLA.

It is a one hour video but on the whole worth watching I think.  There is an amusing cameo appearance of a very brief Castaneda-related anecdote in the middle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_mYlqDvo_o (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_mYlqDvo_o)

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 06 December 2014 05:48:25 AM
(http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee420/gmbgmb/Hkq3c_zpsktdu0lr3.gif)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 06 December 2014 04:30:02 PM
Hi G.

Victor Sanchez is interesting because he is the only one, so far as I'm aware, who would actually take his students to meet his teachers.  Thus he is the only one who gave his students any opportunity to check up on his claims to authenticity.

Quote
For three years, we had made four attempts to penetrate the area under adequate conditions.  The first three proved fruitless.  The strategy we followed was: Once we had decided to try to enter the desert, we began preparations for the trip in the most conscientious manner possible, and we went ahead as long as there was no sign or manifestation to hold us back.  We summed it up with the simple affirmation, "If the door opens, then we go through; if not, then we return."  And that is how it was.  The first three attempts were aborted almost as we were about to enter.  The door remained closed because of a small argument between two group members, damage to one of the vehicles, lack of integration and coordination of the group as a whole, a storm, some incident with the people of the surrounding towns.

Anyone might think that such signs were too trivial and we could have gone on.  For me there is no doubt we did the correct thing.  Beyond external manifestations, the internal voice of Silent Knowledge hidden very deep within out being, which we can hear if we learn to employ the kind of attention necessary, told me what to do.  At no time was I spurred on by anxiety, nor did I retreat out of fear.  Given that our intent was not obsessive, rather almost indifferent, we returned on each occasion content and without the least feeling of frustration for not having been able to enter that sacred territory.  Although I personally had the dream of someday being able to take a work group to those places, in reality it did not matter at all if one day it happened or not.  In the end, the work was always to meet the challenges presented to us every day of our lives, and these tentative plans in the areas of "intermediate approach" did not form part of our general program.  Therefore, having established that the door would not open, we returned to our previously scheduled experiences that, on the other hand, were very attractive and demanding.

But it did happen, however, that one fine day the door opened, and we went through.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 08 December 2014 04:16:02 PM
hello mr j and g,

yes there is and difference between claiming past life memeorys or claiming divine information recieving, and claiming directly passed down information from and family or culture line.

i am saying i find miguels claims as beliefable as someone who claims past life memory as their intital source of information.

1. the inventor of the toltec tradition was an fraud.
2. there is another guy who is part of the toltec tradition, he is totally not a fraud.

the eagle knight tradition, from mexico. knights. ancient tradition. mexico. "knight".
i could understand if there was a small town footbal team in mexico called "toltec knights", or a small pub band, like there would be an "aztecs" and an "mayans'. but and ancient mexican tradition, handed down through the generations no.

in the new age people claim anything. couching it in family ties doesnt mean much. i am sure there are plenty of gurus who claim the same. if don juan had just sat down and wrote and book about him self, we wouldnt be having this conversation, it would just be another new age claim.

as it is now it seems clear he is another casta spawned toltec. if there was record or any evidence of him claiming to be and toltec before casta, and maybe there is, then his claim would be more beliefable. and step up from mares / joesph smith.

victor sanchez is also just from that passage and true beliefer. and new ager to boot. the quote is riddled with belieferness. i am guessing he is an "workshop" shaman now. come in, learn to be spiritual and experience divine insight. its real, because i say so.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 08 December 2014 09:20:38 PM
Hi x thanks for your reply.  Now I think I'm getting a clearer sense of where we agree and where we don't.

Find their claims somewhat believable?
Mares
Ruiz
Sanchez
X
no
no
no
J
no
no
yes

Interested in the cult?
Mares
Ruiz
Sanchez
X
yes
yes
no
J
no
no
yes

R U OK with that?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 09 December 2014 07:16:51 PM
hello mr j,

it is more like,

Find their claims somewhat believable?
Mares
Ruiz
Sanchez
X
no
no
no
J
no
no
yes

Interested in the cult?
Mares
Ruiz
Sanchez
X
yes-no
yes-no
yes-no
J
no
no
yes


yes for them being part of the wider total view of the casta story. no for them not individually being anything special. there has also been disagreement of the value of the hypothetical cut off point of truth, and the value of of the widescreen picture. i and add - there has been discrepancies about wether some things are interesting or not.*
there is lots interestering about the spin offs. its like and bunch of people were given the same rules and framework - casta material - , and all went off in all sorts of different crazy variations. they all display some characterstics that could help fine tune the image of casta. for example, like sanchez, they all set them selfs up as the gatekeeper to the knowledge. "one fine day - i decided the door opened."

ps. i did watch the video. i didnt' get much out of it, not very interested in yaquis. i didnt especially like the the speaker. if you post more videos i will watch them.

*when scrutinizing any big picture there are parts that are not interesting to look at, but they are still part of the full picture.

could you please give and source for your sanchez quote. when sanchez claims to hear his internal silence voice, he is claiming we are more than meat. that is and big claim to casually make. where is his evidence for that, let alone his super toltecs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tScAyNaRdQ

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 09 December 2014 10:30:14 PM
That quote is from the book which you have, about a fifth of the way through chapter 8, "Omen on the Sacred Mountain".

Quote
when sanchez claims to hear his internal silence voice, he is claiming we are more than meat. that is and big claim to casually make.

I guess you are referring to this: "Beyond external manifestations, the internal voice of Silent Knowledge hidden very deep within our being, which we can hear if we learn to employ the kind of attention necessary, told me what to do."

I mentally translate "internal voice of Silent Knowledge" as "intuition".  Sanchez is saying he has a well-developed and reliable intuition.  It's true that not many people dignify their intuitions with capital letters and call it Silent Knowledge, but it's easy enough to translate back into intuition, and to remember that it is probably a common human failing to think that one's intuition is more well-developed and reliable than it really is.

Also many people, perhaps even most people, think that they are "more than meat".

If you decide to not be interested in books written by people who think they are more than meat, then your reading matter will be very slim.

Similarly I mentally translate "toltec" as "central american shamanism".  To me, it's neither dubious nor surprising that shamanistic traditions handed down through generations should survive in the present day.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 10 December 2014 12:50:03 PM

P.S. ...... Russians ...... !! ...... hopefully Merlin can advise.

P.P.S. off on hols 4 a few days.

J
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 10 December 2014 01:38:55 PM
hello mr j,

 good luck on your holidays.

youre mental translator may serve you well, but it is not the thing being examined. if sanchez meant intuition, he would of said that. he meant the deep voice from within our being/meat. he clearly is presenting it as something more than common inutition. you know that.

no doubt that most people think they are more than meat. wether thru reilgion or spiritual or new age or enlarged ego or love or poetry, people think that. there are lots of examples of people beliefing they are more than meat, but the stack of evidence is lacking.

i never said i am not interested in anything any more-than-meat beliefer has written or created. i am ok with wading through uninteresting things looking for the interesting bits.

when sanchez talks of the voice very deep within our beings, he is either talking about the inner voice of meat or an soul like concept, some extra part of us that is not physical. guess which one he is referencing. claiming more than meat is an big deal, it suggests an whole system of non physical things, an entire cosmology, that no one else knows, aside from the claimer. due to the ratio of claims vs evidence through out history, it seems wise to be careful when dealing with meat deniers.

it is very beliefable there are shaman traditions handed down that survived to the current day. it is not beliefable that any of those traditions are the toltec tradition as created and described by carlos castaneda.

do central american shamams mentally translate them selfs as "toltecs" ?

i mentally translate toltec as the thing casta invented, and the rather large and still active network of spin off groups that spawned from him.

ps. i will look up the chapter to see what happens when the door opens. so we will have something to argue about next year.

mr x.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGDA0Hecw1k
Title: Off topic interlude
Post by: Mr G on 17 December 2014 02:11:21 PM
More than meat's the I

I report what I experience only. I must believe in more than meat, my being rebels against it when I don't.

However-

I don't know what it means, what it is, or whether it's due to mental illness.

Therefore-

I cannot attach myself to a religion or a system of mysticism. I think they are probably all hooey.

But-

I experience God, or something. As I am aware that my meat is attached to earth, I am aware that my mind is attached to another thing. I cannot detach from it. It is me, and more.

Yet-

To label, classify or index it seems like a mistakce. It seems it adds another layer to separate my meat and me.

Or-

Maybe I'm crazy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd2B6SjMh_w
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 17 December 2014 10:14:06 PM
hello mr g,

interested points.

i admire and respect your meat+ belief, but. how do you know it is not meat rebelling. it seems like meat would want to feel special in order to keep itself alive and active, inorder to grow more meat (procreate). with the complexities of the human mind being capable of making and person feel worthless, and then suicide, it seem advantageous meat would want to think, in an hardwired/typical way, that it is more than just meat.

and average straight man cant help but find boobs or women attractive. they just are, we cant help it. but boobs are just meat in the universe. we are hardwired to like them. there is no need for and god or and cosmology or an meaning for us to like them. no need for an love vibration of energy. just hard coded meat. men have to feel like more than an sack of useless meat to pursue the boobs. some confidence in their own worth. it is part of the process.

i would be willing to bet an testical, well maybe an kidney...no, one of my toes (not the big toe) that nobody knows what it means or what it is. i doubt your experience is mental illness. there is an huge many wide margin for meat to mental illness, in terms of what is considered crazy or what could be crazy. the context matters to, "jesus told me to have a bbq" is fine by society standards if you then lead your congregation outside the church and eat bbq. if you say "jesus told me to have a bbq" to the camera while the handcuffs go on, with an burning police car in the background, people thing you are crazy.

the big religions have and huge following all added up, it appears being meat is the crazy one. "what, you dont belief sky god will take your meat, haircut and clothes to the afterworld ? crazy" being meat+ doesnt seem crazy. and in the context you posted, seems cautious and rational.

i like that you went straight to god, or something. the line between meat and god seems paper thin.

the idea of being more than meat is terrifying.

mr x.

mr merlin, are you meat ? the post you posted and deleted suggested you like ed sheerans meat. and nellie from the office. red meat.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 19 December 2014 09:14:42 AM
It is an interesting idea that god is an evolutionary coping mechanism for meatcomputers. It makes some sense to me, and I wouldn't mind if that's the case. Meowever, I am unconvinced that meat and matter are really the best explanation for our state of existence. To my me, it seems there must be something more fundamental than bits of stuff plus some coordinates in speecetime. Those coordinates themselves are meat-free, if you catch my drift.

In fact, the bits of matter can be wholly described by a set of numbers. So I offer here, in a thought container, that the locally observabubble universe could be replaced (by a theoretical "Observator") with a suitably large computer simulation. Indulge me... if all particles of matter can be described digitally, as well as the laws that govern their interactions, it means that we don't really need matter at all. Except for the small matter of the gigantic computer, of course.

I jest - my question is whether my meat is meat at all. What if it's made of multitudinous minute "me's"? (One might call it, mini-me's, if one were obnoxious.)

What if fundamental particles were fundamental units of self awareness, each putting up a tiny hand that says little more than "Hi there, I exist separately from you". How this comes to be seems like a topic for another discussion, perhaps entitled "Genesis". Here's a preview:

Quote
Genesis

It was, and then it realised it was, and then there were two things: It, and it's realisation. "Was" was there all along whispering in the darkness.

How the rules of interaction and the different amounts of energy per particle come about is something I'll have to think about some more. But let's face it, these are the cockamamie theorizings of a meat madman.

Excelsior!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eOnm2tYJHs
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 19 December 2014 12:33:12 PM
Minutes later he thought: "Did I write this crap?"

Hey, just poking at a rock with a stick.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 22 December 2014 04:34:39 AM
hello mr g,

let me just say, while i find the meatist view and logical and safe place, i am not an fundameatalist, i am open to to the ideas of meat+ and meat-. it just seems like meatism is an good starting point. we all can agree we are on planet earth, we are meat *, and we are having an converstation. 

when we conversate into areas such as victor sanchez hearing an deep inner voice, should we just assume meat has an inner voice connected no physically to the world, and listen to what his meat+ voice has to say. it makes more sense we would first stop to question wether there is an inner voice that is beyond meat, rather than listen to what the voice says. we cant examine something like casta or some other thing, assuming that just because other people say there is an inner voice then we can brush past that more than meat claim. unless there is some evidence, then we can start from = meat+ inner voice.

the number an coordinates or meat in time and space are interested. meat- , subatomic meat. it is an interesting rabbit hole to go down. starting from meat, it is safe to explore weird ideas.

you meat- ideas seem very psychedelic, an i am not convinced. **

mr x.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X_2IdybTV0

* if we died near hungry cats, the cats would eat us, therefore we are meat.

**evil people also use the term mini me, not just the obnoxious.

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 22 December 2014 11:26:17 PM
***synchro***synchro***synchro***

Hello I am back.  While Mr G was writing that message about possibly us all living in a simulation, I was a little further up in these mountains where I met a wildlife ranger who when he heard where I was from, said that wolves (which have been steadily increasing their range for the last 30 years) have now easily reached where I live.

I said, then how come we don't hear wolves howling at night.  He said that when I get home I should provoke them to call, by howling at them, and he showed how to do it, how to simulate a wolf howl.  He said that if I do that, then if there are any wolves in the vicinity that night, they will reply.

Simulate a wolf howl, to try to call forth a real wolf.

And now Mr G speaks of a simulated universe and I wonder if the purpose of such a thing could be to try to call forth a real universe.
Title: Re: arooo and goodnight
Post by: Mr X on 24 December 2014 07:25:52 AM
hello mr j,

while mr g was typing about digital meatless universes, and you were learning how to yell at wolfs, i was playing in an digital world, hunting wolves with an light machine gun (for the fur and meat). of course that means nothing, i just was.*

i do understand it can be hard to describe why and synchro is relevant and made and impact to ones perception. so i will give you the benifet of the doubt.

simulate to call forth the real, makes sense.

call forth and entire universe ? what.

call forth ?

mr g did note in the meatless digitial universe, there is the small matter of the matter the computer is made of. and the matter in which it is placed(and entire real matter based universe, obviously). and the matter that made it.

what use is the simultated universe, how could it bring forth and real universe, considering the simulation takes place within and matter based real universe.

and mr g, reducing meat down to elements that are not meat, does that add or and make anything special or meanginful to the 3 dimensional meat ? and block of wood is also made up of little bits. does that give the wood meaning or make the wood any more than wood. or is it still just and block of wood in the universe. are all those little bits just there to determine that the wood is wood.

mr j, for note, at last we spoke, i opened the book, to exactly chapter eight. but it was no synch. the gloss photo pages in the middle caused to book to naturally open at that point, when meat hands open the paper pages.

if anyone here is of the christian persuasion and has and xmass, then enjoy your holiday.

yours truly,

mr x.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoAO0851FwA

mr g, bring on genesis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pkVLqSaahk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0qBaBb1Y-U

ppss. while we are scheduled to argue about sanchez next year mr j, next year i am also planning to very carefully break the law and obtain and series of substances to examine out shamanistic viewpoints for mine self. so i would suggest that is also and topic; is it worth trying/peeking out of the cave at all, is there anything morally wrong with the attempt due to laws, is there anything to gain from such experience, under what ritualistic circumstances should each things be taken, what should be the focus of the experience. and most importantly, if any one want to join in, despite physical disclocation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STB4BzMFDz0

pppsss.
see you all next year.

* (for reference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLt6T-WeToI)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 24 December 2014 02:28:44 PM
"there is the small matter of the matter the computer is made of"

Well yes he did indeed mention that.  But does it have to be made of matter at all?  There are lots of delicious possibilities.

One possibility is that it could be being simulated by some yet higher level of universe.  And that higher level?  Could be being simulated by some yet higher level still.  Does this chain of recursive simulations ever have to end up with an actual top level simulator made of matter?  Maybe there is no top level, and *every* level is simulated by some yet higher level.

Numbers go on for ever.  There doesn't have to be a biggest number.  Every number nestles comfortably in the shadow of a bigger number.  Likewise, every universe could be sweetly simulated by a higher universe.

Psychedelic and unconvincing, you say?  Also, one might add, a tad over-complicated?  Well, psychedelic is good, no problem with that.

As for the unconvincingness and the complicatedness, I think that what trumps both of those is the amazing *economy* of such a scheme.

Because, the problem with a material universe is that it is so darned expensive.  All that stuff, all those bits and pieces, where do they all come from, who paid for them?  Each particle could be pretty small, but add them all up and they must weigh tons.

A stack of simulating universes, none of which are actually made of matter, would be cheap and light.

I think Mr G might have been hinting along these lines when he said "if all particles of matter can be described digitally, as well as the laws that govern their interactions, it means that we don't really need matter at all."

Or maybe he was going even further, and suggesting that a simulated universe would be so lightweight and maintenance-free (after all, the parts wouldn't even need oiling) that perhaps it wouldn't even need a simulator ... it could just ... kind of ... be.

In which case, have we actually said anything at all?

This is where Wittgenstein comes in.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 24 December 2014 03:14:56 PM
But before getting on to that I'd like to mention a couple of problems with Mr G's suggestion, insofar as I understand it, which are:

(1) "if all particles of matter can be described digitally": for this to be true, it seems that space and time would have to be discrete.  An arbitrary position in a continuous medium cannot be described by a finite number of digits, but needs a real number (which has an infinite number of digits).  There's an interesting argument which says that if space and/or time are continuous, then the universe has to be *real* (cannot be simulated) because it involves *real numbers* (i.e. cannot be measured with complete accuracy, which it would have to be, to be represented digitally)

(2) "as well as the laws that govern their interactions": the problem here is with interpretations of quantum mechanics which say that the laws are only probabilistic and there are no "hidden variables" which, represented digitally, could allow matter to be dispensed with.

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 24 December 2014 03:23:13 PM
P.S. however,

"String theory is giving us some strong hints that perhaps spacetime at short distances is not continuous or discrete, but something else that we don't understand yet."

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33273/is-spacetime-discrete-or-continuous (http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33273/is-spacetime-discrete-or-continuous)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 24 December 2014 03:56:02 PM
Hello all, just typing this on my phone.. I'd like to point out that a computer should not have much trouble describing particles and other stuff probabilistically.. And what makes it even more better is that it can describe fields and chunks of matter as a whole by a set of properties.. Must have a fantastic compression ratio on that.. Also i took pains to limit my universe.. I said ovservabubble which is dumb but understandable.. So space not continuous in my description..

I haven't tried to be smart in years, but maybe next year's the year.. Will check your links then.. Until then, enjoy the holidays, and Mr X, may you partake in peace..

Peace!
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 04 January 2015 09:32:07 AM

Well, where Wittgenstein comes into this (ref post #45) is as follows:

have we any reason to believe that entities in a simulation could have conscious experience?

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 08 January 2015 10:06:22 PM

If entities in a simulation could have conscious experience, does the simulation have to actually run in order for them to have this experience?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 09 January 2015 08:32:02 AM
Perhaps you can point me to a web page with the part of Wittgenstein's ideas you are referring to. As far as I can tell, and what I thought I knew, is that his work was mainly about philosophy itself.. the logic and the language and such. If you are saying that "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.", I respect that, and that makes this discussion meaningless. Or wait, no, unsinnig - nonsensical.

Oh.. wait:

Quote
In which case, have we actually said anything at all?
Just re-read your post.

Yeah. I think I might see your point. Maybe you and Mr X (Hello) should talk about nuts and bolts again, this is your thread after all.

Cheers!
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 10 January 2015 09:57:55 PM
I hope Mr X is reading Sanchez and letting Sanchez change his mind.  If that doesn't work I have another suggestion, but let's see what effect Sanchez has first.  Meanwhile there are some fascinating aspects to this simulation idea at the nuts and bolts level.

For example, it's interesting to consider the problem of migrating the simulation to new hardware.  In outline it might seem quite simple:  first get the program running on the new hardware, and set the simulated date and time to be the same as it is on the old hardware; then one can switch off the old hardware.  If done correctly, presumably the simulated entites should not notice that anything unusual happened.

Well, here is the first question: is it really necessary to get the program running on the new hardware *before* switching off the old hardware?  After all, date and time in the simulated universe presumably bear no relation to date and time in the simulating universe.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 12 January 2015 06:52:29 AM
hello,

i dont have much to add to the discussion on the nuts and the bolts of the universe. for now my answer is meat. we are an sim ? still meat. i dont know if entities in a simulation could have conscious experience. based on modern computing, probably not. have to run to have the experience, probably yes.

the idea of infinte sims, like the idea of infinte god layers, or the idea of there always being something before the big bang, is an nice idea. still meat though.

shirley the sim idea has be thoroughly fine tooth combed by philospers, what is the distillation of their findings. to cut to the chase.

we have said nothing and it is silly, because we are human meat and have no chance of figuring out the entire universe and the mysterys of existance. not that it isnt fun to talk about it or try.

mr g, s'il vous plait mon ami, this is just an general purpose thread, you could post an bread recipe or movie review here and i wouldnt mind.

if you messed with the date and time in the switch, i imagine there would be an anomaly in the memory of some peoples meat.

"letting Sanchez change his mind"

haha. more on that next time.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 12 January 2015 03:07:21 PM
(http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee420/gmbgmb/f48yt35_zpsbffac1fd.jpg)

Happy new year X, the simulation idea is just a means to an end for me. I don't really believe that we are definitely in a simulation, but my position is that you cannot be sure that it's wrong. Let's take the Matrix as an example. I can think of no way that we can prove that The Matrix isn't literally true (though dumb), just as we cannot be sure that God planted dinosaur bones to test our faith.

This comes from an argument I had with an atheist friend. My point, as an agnostic, is that his position is also somewhat faith based. Or assumption based, at least. I say that as it stands, one cannot know either way. His main beef was with churches, or religions, and the tons of badness they have wrought. I don't disagree with this, but what I find interesting is that expressions of religion is most often about people trying to be better people. The fact that they usually get it all wrong is an unhappy accident of history, caused by the fact that we're apemonkeys.

I don't know if we have to look at the philosophy of simulations. It may be better to go straight to the meat and potatoes.

We find ourselves on opposite ends of the following debate: Your opinion, I think, is most closely described as "Materialism":

Quote
Materialism is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all phenomena, including mental phenomena and consciousness, are the result of material interactions.

(wikipedia)

My position, I think, is best described as "Dualism":

Quote
In philosophy of mind, dualism is the position that mental phenomena are, in some respects, non-physical, or that the mind and body are not identical.

(wikipedia)

Would you agree with this? What do you think, Mr J?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 12 January 2015 08:27:29 PM
Hi. You might be amused by "Am I an atheist or an agnostic?" by Bertrand Russell

( http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/russell8.htm (http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/russell8.htm) )

According to wiktionary, the primary meaning of 'substance' is 'matter'.  Which, to me, means that saying "matter is the fundamental substance in nature" is not saying very much.

As for "all phenomena, including mental phenomena and consciousness, are the result of material interactions" ... I disagree with that, because people who seem reliable have described phenomena which seem unlikely to be the result of material interactions.

For example, the buffalo snuffling which George "Tink" Tinker heard on his vision quest.

Quote
The account has to do with a visit from the buffalo nation, that is, from that spiritual reservoir that gives life and character to all buffalo. As such, it has no material reference other than every buffalo at all times. While the buffalo nation is present in every buffalo, it also has its own separate presence dating from the origin of the cosmos. My own encounter with the buffalo and interaction with its conscious presence affected my entire experiential knowledge base in ways that permanently altered my conception of reality.

I hasten to preface my account of this experience by acknowledging that I have also been trained in the modalities of Euro-Western science - even if this training was in the so-called humanities. Nevertheless, cause and effect, evidentiary warrants, demonstrable proofs, and the like are the skills in which we are all trained. I have always considered myself to be a "hard sell" (and still do) when it comes to matters classified as "paranormal" by the academy. One can imagine, then, my surprise when my microworld began to be turned inside out in ceremonial contexts. The following example is an incident that occurred while I was making the rite of vigil (sometimes popularly called vision quest) about two decades ago. I still live out of the experience and still work to understand the event more fully.

I was engaging in this ceremony largely for cultural and personal identity reasons. I had no expectation of really having a vision of any kind. For me the experience was to be one of intense prayer and physical endurance. I had decided to spend four days and four nights in this ceremony, in an isolated location in a very small half-dome lodge with no food and no water. My ancestors had done it. I felt a need to experience some sense of solidarity with them and with those Indian relatives who were still engaging in this ceremony. But a vision? I was too far gone for that, I assumed. Too much of a skeptic and too well-trained as an objective scholar. Moreover, this was not my first completion of this ceremony. I was already experienced and knew pretty much what to expect: hunger, thirst, unbearable heat in the daytime and cold at night.

After four days, I can report, one is utterly exhausted. The lack of water means that the body's systems are thoroughly dried out; one's tongue is glued to the roof of the mouth; the voice has ceased to function since the middle of day three; and one is hoping against hope to hear the sound of the pickup grinding up the mountain to come and retrieve you any minute. And minutes wear on at that point like hours. Delirium is certainly not far away at any given moment, and the onset of a vision would be quite explicable in terms of an altered state of consciousness. Yet there was no vision on this fourth day, as there was none on the third day and none the day before that.

Strangely enough, my quiet repose had been disturbed only at the end of the first twenty-four hours - long before the possibility of an altered state of personal consciousness might have explained the event. I had been sitting in the lodge fighting off the inevitable dusk attack of mosquitoes. The sun had not yet set but was well on its way. Within the half hour it would begin to pierce the western horizon. Suddenly, I was startled by the loud snorting of a large animal on the north side of the lodge, followed by a pounding on the willow framework. It sounded for all the world like a snorting buffalo bull. It was so startling that I immediately leaped to my feet and out of the door of the lodge. My heart was thumping mightily against my ribs. Yet at that very same moment I found myself creating rational explanations. I thought first of the Shetland ponies that the Wicasa wakan (holy man) kept on a different part of his expansive reservation property. As I emerged from the lodge and looked down the hill in all directions for several hundred yards, I saw nothing at all. The late afternoon was as still as possible with not even the slightest breeze. Then, with my heart continuing to protest loudly, I decided that I had merely heard some smaller animal, perhaps one of the field mice that had scampered over the lodge earlier in the afternoon, and had somehow magnified the sound in my own mind. That seemed to satisfy my need for rational explanation at the moment, so I took a few minutes to walk around the lodge in each of the directions to say a small prayer. Then I returned to the lodge and sat down to continue fighting off mosquitoes.

I had managed to calm myself down almost completely, comforting myself with the studied knowledge of years of PhD work that these things do not happen, or at least that they can always be explained rationally. Indeed, I had began to quietly laugh at myself and my startle reflex when just as suddenly as before I heard the same snorting of a buffalo bull and the aggravated pawing at the north side of the lodge. If anything, it was louder than before, and it was certainly no mouse. Again, my startle reflex had me on my feet and out of the lodge in a flash. And again, only to discover that I was entirely alone with the absolute stillness of what was now the beginning of evening, the sun dipping into the horizon. This time I was less clear that things could so easily be explained away. As I have already noted, it was much too early to think of an altered state of consciousness. In fact, the first day had been relatively easy if quite warm. After praying once again, I returned to my seat in the small lodge.

When the same event reoccurred a third time, I found myself far less startled than before, although I once again rose dutifully from my seat and exited the lodge. The sun was not yet completely set, and I could still see for several hundred yards in each direction. There was no possibility of anything or anyone approaching the lodge and escaping unseen. As I settled into the lodge afterward, the event occurred a fourth time. I had two thoughts. One was to stay put where I was. Even an educated Osage, I thought to myself, can learn something by the fourth repetition. The second thought was simply this: "My boy, your PhD is now officially in trouble." No, the buffalo did not speak to me, but its presence was as powerful as if he had. It is now more than two decades later, and I am still struggling to understand what occurred on that day. I am long past the temptation to deny that it happened or to try explaining it away, since I have had other experiences even more remarkable than this.

mwbdvjh.muse.jhu.edu/journals/wicazo_sa_review/v019/19.2tinker.html (http://mwbdvjh.muse.jhu.edu/journals/wicazo_sa_review/v019/19.2tinker.html)

So if that is to be believed, I think that there are phenomena which probably aren't the result of material interactions.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 12 January 2015 09:18:34 PM
This may seem like a not entirely appropriate moment in the discussion to point out that I have disabled registrations on the bulletin board on account of...

a) A Russian invasion of bogus registrants.
b) A worry point about the software being two versions out of date.

... as you were ...
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 13 January 2015 11:00:50 AM
Thanks, I've now updated the forum software, re-enabled registration and put in place a sim-resistant challenge-question.


* edit * Crikey! During the two minutes between when I re-enabled registration and when I put in the new challenge-question, a new member (now a new ex-member) successfully registered!  Obviously I should have done those two actions in the opposite order.  Sorry about that!

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 20 January 2015 08:54:27 AM
What should I say to the sr and hat member who I helped register successfully here and whose account then got deleted in less than 24 hours?!?!?  Please advise.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 20 January 2015 12:06:39 PM
hello,

oh my. this is funny. with all the talk of russian invaders, i thought one made it through. and posted and story about eating dead cats. so i deleted it and them.

i have and screenprint of the post, i will add it later.

mr x.

ps.
zizils post
http://i.imgur.com/Xpp9yS5.jpg
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 20 January 2015 02:47:05 PM
hello mr g,

yes i agree that the athiest position is faith/assumption based. it is funny and amazing how and person can tally up their life experience, then think "i am the one who knows the reality of the universe". to be honest, the faith of an athiest or and religious or and spiritual seem to be faith in their own importance. not so much the thing they belief in is great, but they are great for being one of the ones who have figured out what is right.

mr surely, yes you have it correct. meaterialism vs dualism. i am not against dualism, i would like it if that is the way things are. as an meat popsicle, i am frozen in place, stuck in materialism due to it making sense in an way that cant be argued with. if i am meat i am 1- sensible, and most importantly - 2 not like all those crazy people who are absolutley convinced they are definatley more than meat, such as victor sanchez. i am so very cautious of peering beyond the meat curtains and accidentaly belifing in something that is not in anyway real.

the meat thing is of course and bit tounge and cheek, but the idea is the same. what is one dualism idea that we can verifiy, and solid truth that is not mere fantasy like the bulk of the new age.

mr j,

i have said it before and i will say it again, i am and slow reader. in full transperancy - i have only read half of chapter 8. if eye rolling lead to major injuries, that half would of sent me to an hospital.

how you can take him seriously i do not know, so i am assuming you are somewhat like him, or the culture that spawned him. i wont offend you by calling you an new ager, but you must be fairly deep into dualism to read those pages and nod youre head. this is not an critic but and observation.

castas don juan path was an world were you opt out of society. sanchezes wirrakia world is an society. even though he follows the standard nazgul formula of not supporting casta but using casta to prop up his views, his mexican shamans and castas super shamans have nothing to do with each other. it is not the same, and sanchez trys to force the idea it is the same. do you think, if castas don juan was real, he would wear traditional clothes and an funny hat, as an fundamental part of his identity ?

toltecs of the new millenium, published by well know enablers bear and co. 1996 new age vintage. shamanism/mayan studies. it reads like an checklist of new ager ideas, perfectly acceptable vague nothings that can be interpreted to have meaning that is not there.

how deep do you want to go down this rabbit hole. i am okay with breaking it down page by page, despite the effort, but i really dont think you could defend him for long until you move onto youre other suggestion.

he talks about disregarding mental and emotional obsessions, he is also and known egoist who is obsessed with his own righteousness.

he uses casta terminology to make his case, he is known for knowing better than casta. (standard) casta was against sanchez.

he is extremely interested in himself.

the adventure to the mexicans he pretends are toltecs, the door opening and closing, is completely  and only restricted by his own made up obstacles. no need for an sign. at all.
"we had achieved and compact group of participants who met, step by step, the demands of the various workshops during the past thirteen months."
isnt that amazing, there are actually, according to the spirit magic of the universe, an set amount of required workshops, in order to meet some mexicans. you even get to pay for them ! praise the sun.

he speaks of only being able to see special worlds if you have a true life, and strong life. victor sanchez knows if youre life is true or not. pretty amazing. he also knows if you are energetically good or bad. he checks twice before going to the door. energetically. knows.

grandfather fire tatewari is not something castas don juan would of been into. its nice sanchez has some magical friends, but it is so very forced.

"such experiences, by the way, turned out to be highly substantial, since they allowed us to know much about the world and about ourselves. many fundamental techniques, in particular those favouring the connection with the awareness of the earth, were developed there."

that is many words to say nothing. classic new age filler speak. they learnt so much about their very interested selfs. "i didnt' know i liked cilantro, until i went on and spirit journey !"
they learnt much about the world, not in an figured out faster than light travel way, but in an realized the desert is hot kinda way. they learnt how very interesting they personally are. they realized, very deeply, they are on earth. they developed many fundamental techniques to realized you are on earth and lime goes with everything. those people with and proper life and right energy.

i could go on, and on, and on. i will finish reading that chapter and maybe some more, but sanchez is and grade a nazgul.

best try your other suggestion.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 20 January 2015 08:55:08 PM
What should I say to the sr and hat member who I helped register successfully here and whose account then got deleted in less than 24 hours?!?!?  Please advise.

I'd go with ... "consider it an agreement from the world, a lesson in the not-doing of joining a discussion-less board and posting."

They always fall for that kind of stuff.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 21 January 2015 10:39:17 PM
Quote
oh my. this is funny. with all the talk of russian invaders, i thought one made it through. and posted and story about eating dead cats. so i deleted it and them.

Gleep!  The first ever result of your publicity drive and you go and blow it!

Well what would you like to do?  There may be some possible remedies.

For example I've had a quick look at the forum backups and there is a backup which has her registration.  Rolling the forum back to that point would be easy and posts made since then can easily be added manually since there have only been a few.

(The seemingly simpler alternative of re-registering her account using the information in her profile would not work correctly, because we wouldn't be able to re-create her original password, and pasting the encrypted version of her password into the database also most likely would not work correctly, because in all probability SMF password encryption is (or should be!) salted with an appropriate nonce such as the user number.)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 22 January 2015 08:26:50 AM
hello mr j,

i have copy pasted posts post zizil to an text file so you can go ahead and rollback if that is the best solution.

a result of the publicity drive ? amazing. the russian threat did seem real, after the giant number of new member joined emails mid december, i dont pay attention to any new memeber notifications.

mr x.

ps.
i think that was my first administrative action. i am amused.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 22 January 2015 05:23:06 PM
Well well well... three holes in the ground.

While you're deciding what to do, here's something I happened on today. From a Wired Magazine interview with prof. Seth Lloyd of MIT.

Quote
Would it be fair to say the universe is a mind?
You could use that metaphor. And if you did, then you and I and my cat are its thoughts. But the vast majority of the universe's thinking is about humble vibrations and collisions of atoms.

You seem to be saying that the concept of the universe as one huge quantum computer is not just a metaphor - it's real.
Absolutely. Atoms and electrons are bits. Atomic collisions are "ops." Machine language is the laws of physics. The universe is a quantum computer.

This is my favourite bit:

Quote
What is the universe computing when we are not hijacking it for our own purposes?
It computes itself. It computes the flow of orange juice as you drink it, or the position of each atom in your cells.

I put this up only as an interesting point to ponder. I understand nothing.

I have known two people who have told me they've ate a cat. The first one was simply out of hardship. He said it tasted like rabbit, but I haven't tasted rabbit either. The other ate some leopard in an initiation ritual. He said it felt as if the leopard was clawing its' way out of his stomach and he was sick. Personally, I'm partial to lamb chops; and in the mornings, an occasional strip of pork bacon with the egg of a domesticated chicken hen.

Ain't no accountin' for taste, I say.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 22 January 2015 06:24:05 PM
it is like we are on borrowed time, before the sim resets. come on and rollback mr j.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJ-jS3IhQEk

ps. charred lamb with tzaitki on naan bread. yes please.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 22 January 2015 06:54:47 PM
(http://zeta.forum4.org/pix/zizil.jpg)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 22 January 2015 06:57:49 PM
Hello zizil.

Interesting complementarity.

Thing is, I just logged in at the hat to answer your poll, and couldn't answer it.  I couldn't even see the question.  The reason is something I'd forgotten about until just now, which is that I am actually banned from the members-only areas of the hat.

Years ago when I registered as a member at the hat, I made a single post in the members only area and was immediately banned and the post was removed.  My user id still works there but only in the non members areas.

Funny thing is, I don't even know what I posted that was so bad.  I never kept a copy of it.  I figured that if anyone replied to my post, I'd take a copy then.  But the post was deleted and I was banned before anyone replied.

To make matters worse, and increase my suspicion that I must have done something wrong, they never even gave me a proper explanation of what happened.

Interesting, huh?  Now we have a parallel situation with what happened to you here.

Would a deal make sense, if I could get you reinstated here could you get me reinstated at the hat.  Do you have any admin powers there?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 22 January 2015 09:51:09 PM
That zizl character seems a tad peeved about something.
They do have a point; the mailman based email discussion system is hardly seamless.

However, the Chamber of Secrets is a brand belonging to Forum3 (along with The Grimoire).
So how come they stole my brand for their poll?

I expect there might be a very good reason why you got banned, and encouraging this admin, should they actually be one, to break rank and let you in through the side door is an appalling request.

Does anyone else not understand the polish-mother-jokes reference?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tosk on 23 January 2015 07:52:25 AM
You should have access to the Seer's Window now, ga7at.
Let me know if you still don't.

I thought this had been fixed already.
Julia's last ever post was an agreeing to lift that ban.

We had all forgotten exactly why you were banned.
Sorry.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 23 January 2015 05:12:53 PM
Ra6, just to remind:

a) You were booted for being gratuitously abrasive.
b) You'd really prefer not to have access to a hat area that isn't accessible to everyone who visits the hat.

:pop:
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 23 January 2015 06:05:33 PM
hello,

this deal thing is hilarious. it seems that mr j helped zizil join here to curry favor with an possible hat admin, so he could get access to secret hat business. i accidentally messed that up, mr j had the go ahead to resinstall zizil, but used the moment to reveal his true desire - hatcess*. with sweet offerings of "if I could get you reinstated here". ha. at least it appears that way. and the whole time could of just gone to tosk directly.

Does anyone else not understand the polish-mother-jokes reference?

i am and bit behind here. things i dont get -

disscution less scating board
sitting alone in darkness
polish mother
poll
secret chamber
why zizil didnt finish the cheesel
forum3
grimoire
brand
zizil
what the hell

i think that covers it.

mr x.

*(hat access)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 23 January 2015 07:03:18 PM
(http://zeta.forum4.org/pix/zizil2.jpg)
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: âspen on 23 January 2015 11:09:19 PM
Well3.  Now Mr X wants to know why zizil didn't finish the cheese.

This gives me an idea.

Zizil the secret answer to the challenge-question is still the same as it was last time you registered.  You could register again.

Then if like Scheherazade you keep Mr X's curiosity unsatisfied he will not be able to delete your account.

The thousand and one cheeses.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 24 January 2015 04:11:19 PM
OK, but no deal -deal was accepted by  zizil, not by the tally-ho! identity.

and what i sent you by mail you post if you like - i had enough.
but please skip the answer to "why didn't zizil finish the cheese?"
(well - this ancient coanic question actually was never  answered...yet... it's only about the circumstances of the QUESTION coming into creation... but it might satisfy Mr X's curiosity nevertheless, and providing he is really  acting out of pure nastiness, :-* as you described it - pah! what will stop him from deleting me another time?
sorry i'm coming here so - how did you call it? teddy-bear? tad peeved - no greatings, no demonstration of good manners... just - all this story... and -  i spend most of my day on-linewhile i should have done other things... so to say... zizil, why didn't you finish the cheese? (not telling! ha!)

Mr X, did you indeed plot against zizil? why? and are you planning to plot against me as well?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 24 January 2015 04:33:22 PM
ohh, i see what made me so furious.

same view of the board from this user, as from a stranger's point of view.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 24 January 2015 07:03:29 PM
hello,

so mr j, what is the deal with airline food victor sanchez ?

mr x.

ps.
to setup and shaheryar scenario requires the secret haver to be interesting. and not an idiot.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 24 January 2015 07:25:13 PM
Airline food? Victor Sanchez?

This is confusing

Tupe
http://youtu.be/ZQxuw9d2d28?list=UUudZ0PWfd_p5BUb8uBcUtYg
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 24 January 2015 07:49:29 PM
mr merlin,

i am confused,

first you posted broken link, then the song, then the parody. the song was bad enough, paradoy is unbearable.

maybe you should try contributing to the discussion. novel idea to be sure.

mr x.

ps.
how do we make mr g and admin ?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 24 January 2015 08:18:36 PM
mr merlin,

i am confused,

first you posted broken link, then the song, then the parody. the song was bad enough, paradoy is unbearable.

Yes, that's right, except link wasn't broken ... so you too get that this confusing ... and actually I think the parody is the best one.

Quote
maybe you should try contributing to the discussion. novel idea to be sure.

Isn't that what I am doing?  Here?  Now? ("Discussion" such as it is ...) Or am I missing something?  What other contribution are you looking for?  A psychic one perhaps?

Quote
mr x.

ps.
how do we make mr g and admin ?

I expect that probably you have to ask Ra6 (the owner of forum4.org)


Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 24 January 2015 08:41:16 PM
it was broken for me at first, looked like an embedded video that didnt load.

do you think posting imagine dragons songs is contributing to discussion ? what is the "contribution".

Quote
Or am I missing something?  What other contribution are you looking for?  A psychic one perhaps?

(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/you-got-me.gif)

no really, maybe novel ideas such as, let me think, saying what your take is on things that other people are talking about. give me one sentance on sanchez, even if it is "this is the first i have heard of him". sanchez is currently interesting, mr j thinks sanchez is viable.

instead of asking mr j, i will think up and complicated plot.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 25 January 2015 01:05:29 AM
Hello. " i am okay with breaking it down page by page, despite the effort "

Very okay!  Would positively like!!  And, hoping that when it actually happens you will find it more delight than effort.

Only thing is, I need to lay hands on my copy of the book, which is not with me now until may be some weeks.

Hopefully in the meantime mey there be enough discussion to keep the subject alive and make it alright to get down to page by page details in a few weeks.  Meanwhile here are some brief remarks about various things which have cropped up so far.  First to recap, remember that I said very specifically, and clearly I hope, why I find Sanchez interesting:

Quote
Victor Sanchez is interesting because he is the only one, so far as I'm aware, who would actually take his students to meet his teachers.  Thus he is the only one who gave his students any opportunity to check up on his claims to authenticity.

Given that, the following things are not relevant to this particular part of the discussion:

(1) whether Sanchez is an annoying little squirt
(2) whether he is extremely interested in himself
(3) whether what Sanchez means by toltecs relates to what Castaneda means by them
(4) just how silent does knowledge have to be in order to be called silent knowledge
(5) whether there is any sound reason, grammatical or otherwise, for capitalizing it as Silent Knowledge

By all means let us discuss these things also.  For now, I'm only saying that they have no bearing on why I find Sanchez interesting.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 25 January 2015 06:17:03 AM
Hello!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Yq3JuKY2kQ
good morning!
here i am!
relate please!

yea, i'm teddy-bear and starved for attention...

http://spiritualitydiscussiongroup.yuku.com/topic/937/WTH-a-hat-member-
...
edited once by me to chance WTF into WTH [=what the hell] - accepting suggestion of one of the XYZ misters. now, interesting: WTH changing the title will do to the thread? (but no thread...
sitting alone in the darkness
?

when Genaro shits
the mountains shake!

when tally-ho! 
talks to the 4 corners
of boardom?
wait and see!
i might even
throw away
this heavy
explosive chemedan...
(me too, i'm waitin'... patiently.)
"you can't eat cats, victor.
no, you can't eat cats!
you can't eat cats!
true toltecs
 are not
eating cats!
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 26 January 2015 02:50:52 PM
hello mr j,

it is always some effort examining the lesser known toltecs, they are usually lesser known for an reason. but it is needed to maintain my status as and self proclaimed debunker toltexpert hobbyist. i will have and little fun, sure.

i do not have an pc scanner but have considered photographing pages so mr g, t, and m can see them. it is an obscure book from around 20 years ago, i think that would fall under fair use.

given that you find it interested that sanchez is the only one to take students, then sanchez is realevant. everything about him. we are not talking about teachers taking students to teachers in general, we are talking about victor sanchez taking toltec students to toltec masters. i think painting and viewing and wider sanchez picture provides context to his student taking acts.

sanchez being annoying and self obessed matters, that is the character taking the students. a person whos word is the truth. whos ego must not be challenged. sanchez being and casta style beliefer matters. he didnt "gave his students any opportunity to check up on his claims to authenticity"

he carefully selected and groomed people who were already true beliefers, weeded out the ones who's lives were arbitraily not true and right. until he was left with the truest of belifers, people cleaning their tonals and improving their nazguls. people so invested in the belief, and teased by false starts decided by him, that they were going to see his shamans as toltecs wether they were real toltecs or not. people so invested in sanchez being right, there was never going to be any questioning. that was not an authenticity check, that was an "i have carefully selected you to agree with me" event.

he didnt just open up to his "students" and let them visit his sources. as he is an casta style beliefer, taking his similiar casta style students to meet what he claims are toltec shamans, it is fair to say "whether what Sanchez means by toltecs relates to what Castaneda means by them" is relevant.

even for and simple thing like he is interesting because he took students to contacts, all those other little details matter. unless of course we are just talking about teachers who take students to their teachers, in general. like doctors.

so the obvious question remains, mr j - why do you find sanchez interesting soley for the reason he gave his students any opportunity to check up on his claims to authenticity ?

mr x.

ps.
hello ms z.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 26 January 2015 06:53:20 PM
I am shocked and appalled by how poorly Google seems to know me. The "recommended" section of youtube says I should watch "Al Roker Illuminati MK-Ultra Mind Control Breakdown on Live TV EXPOSED !!!" To add insult to injury, it wants me to watch Michio Kaku explain quantum computers. Here is my textual impression of Michio Kaku:

Imagine if you will, even though I know you definitely can't, a thing that is so immensely complex that your mind cannot even grasp the tiniest little bit of it even if you tried - really - quite hard. It is as if your tiny mind is searching for the end of the sticky tape on the roll, and all it can achieve is to go round and round and round it for hours, until you finally tire of it and - realize - that this stuff is best left to us - the professionals.

(http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee420/gmbgmb/maxresdefault2_zpsvpfdsccu.jpg)

What was the other link in Merlin's post? There's only a poor parody left, which I am going to philosophically assume is his point: What passes for culture nowadays is a weak parody of something that wasn't that good to begin with. Commiserations, I feel your pain.

I am sorry, but I am unable to think of Victor Sanchez without thinking of Dirty Sanchez. It is really quite disturbing, I don't know what Freud would have made of this. I suspect it's just because that scene with Mooj in The 40 Year Old Virgin was so funny. I definitely won't post a link to that on youtupe, especially with ladies around. That said, Tally-ho, tally-ho. Mr X, "Ms Z" has a nice ring to it, but what do you think of "Ms T"? Just a suggestion. Ms Z, devourer of pussycats. There's Freud again, spinning in his grave.

Mr J, it's not clear to me whether you think Sanchez is merely interesting, or a candidate for "genuine article". As in, a true teacher of ancient mysteries. What is it that his students report about his teachers, and how reliable do you think those reports are?

PS I would post a tupe, but Youtube now suggests I watch "Aliens Saved Earth From Nuclear Meltdown?" Why Google, why?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 26 January 2015 08:48:17 PM
mr g,

i like the michio impression. it sounds accurate.

if we used ms t, would people think misty is related to mr t ?

other link was https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9FLwTTQ3RQ , i listened to it once and then the music video and had it stuck in my head for 24 hours so be warned.

i like to make fun of merlins tupes because he doesnt like maiden, mostly. i was questioning his contribution as i want him to contribute more, not any problem with tupes. you and i are og tupers from the cocomojoe era. i dont think merlin gets tuping fully. they are for adding to an post, or being and punchline, accent or full stop. or most importantly, as you once said, making oneself cool by association. it takes and skilled tuper to make the post an tupe itself with minimum text. the lady seems tough enough to handle comedy tupes.

mr x.

ps.
the obvious answer to you google problems is that the men in black have been using your wifi.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 29 January 2015 10:55:51 PM
Hello guys and girls.

(According to the member list, there is more than one girl here.)

"Why do you find sanchez interesting solely for the reason he gave his students any opportunity to check up on his claims to authenticity ?"

Basically I'm interested in the question of to what extent traditional spiritual lineages survive in central america.

I find Sanchez interesting to the extent that his activities contribute part of an answer to that question.

So the main question of interest, in this regard, is whether he actually met the people he says he met.

The fact that he took his students to meet them too makes it that much harder for him to have invented the story.

Well of course there is a theoretical possibility that the people who he took his students to meet were actors hired to dress up and pretend to be anciently wise.

I really don't think that is likely enough to be worth worrying about.

Criticisms of Sanchez's character are interesting in their own right but are not relevant to the question of whether he actually managed to meet those people.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 31 January 2015 07:25:09 AM
ok mr j,

i will have to read more of what his shaman friends say, but i dont think he would of made up the people he met. while he may be deluded enough to think they are toltecs, he doesnt seem the type to outright lie about meating some shamans. he is very pro mexico and into indegenious people of mexico.

his next book was about recapitulation to save your soul. not really indigenous ideas. still very casta based and new agey, not ancient traditiony.

the only thing that would make me find spiritual lineages in central america interesting is if they had actual ancient knowledge of value, real the mysteries sort of stuff. creation myths and the reason why the funny hat must be worn is interersting and all as and historical and cultural thing, but lots of people have those stories.

there must be many spiritual traditional lineages all around the world, but just because they are old and indigenous and traditonal doesnt automatically give them value. what if you find an hidden secret group of indians, and they belief in ......thetans and xenu.

it seems beliefable dirty sanchez met some shamans from the wirririka, wether or not they have any outstanding value outside of sanchezs projected "toltecs" is another question.

and yes, at no point would my mind go to "sanchez hired people to wear funny hats".

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 31 January 2015 06:44:29 PM
"i will have to read more of what his shaman friends say"

Hmm... as far as I can remember the book doesn't actually include much if any of that.

Maybe it does and I just forgot, it's years since I read it.  But I think it's more of a nice vibey account of hanging out with shaman friends than anything about their actual teachings.

Also, the intriguing subject of character flaws must be taken into account.  I note that Sanchez seems to annoy you quite a lot ... at least, more than he annoys me.  And there is no pleasure in reading a book by someone who annoys one.

So this might be a good moment for me to mention my other suggestion, which is Martin Prechtel, 'Secrets of The Talking Jaguar: Memoirs from the Living Heart of a Mayan Village'

The thing is, we are all scoundrels, but Prechtel is a completely different kind of scoundrel from what Sanchez is, and I think of a kind that you would find a whole lot more agreeable.

By the way, Prechtel has written a few books.  If you do read one, I would suggest this first one.  The others are more folklory and somewhat tedious (imo).  The one I mentioned is rip-roaring and hilarious.

I haven't mentioned it yet because it has no connection with Castaneda.  But it is central American, near enough to include in the conversation.

Also, there are varying opinions about Prechtel.  So that you know, here is one:

Quote
Dr. Nathaniel Tarn (author of Scandals in the House of Birds: Shamans and Priests on Lake Atitlßn) and Dr. Robert Carlsen (author of The War for the Heart and Soul of a Highland Maya Town) wish to disassociate themselves completely from the latest activities of Mr. Martin Prechtel. When they worked with him in the 1970s, Mr. Prechtel was an honest and knowledgeable collaborator and Tarn and Carlsen gave him joint-author status on a variety of projects as a result. Mr. Prechtel, now calling himself a "Maya Shaman," has in the 1990s, with Putnam as his publisher, written (or had written for him) a self-puffing volume without any scholarly basis whatsoever, but full of anthropology-bashing. His claim, in essence, is that all costumbre is now dead in Atitlßn, but it lives inside him. Therefore he is the only Atitlßn that is left. We regret that, without warning, he has broken all agreements made with us and reiterated over the years to work within a scholarly context. Further, we regret this blatant commercialization of Native American rituals and beliefs at the hands of someone who once respected them.

I highly recommend this book.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 31 January 2015 09:28:41 PM
oops - i mixes Sanchez with Miguel Ruise...
so, correct - first time i hear about him. or rather, i saw once a SR thread about casta suing him for copyright, which seemed really weird, since i thought it was about Migel Ruise's 4 agreements catechism - seemingly enlighted, but really rigid as a rusted door knob. or like this other catechism:
http://www.nibiruancouncil.com/html/keysoverview.html (http://www.nibiruancouncil.com/html/keysoverview.html)
Quote
at no point would my mind go to "sanchez hired people to wear funny hats
".
some Indians are quite hospitable. no need to hire them, they would give you the show which is their life for free, or at least if you bring some groceries. and sanchez brings a bunch of rich tourists to the village!

   as for  those funny hats - they wear them in daily life.
from the sanchez  site:
Quote
This enchanting village is small, quiet, has little cars activity; nice accommodations and charming restaurants and cafes; it is the perfect place to connect with your own soul and with what is eternal.
and touristic.
 
 
Quote
Quetzalcoatl, The Feathered Serpent, represents the realization of this integration and the necessary pathway for all individuals and for the whole human kind. Thus the condition of Toltec represents a universal possibility for all people; indigenous and non-indigenous..
from the coming vision-quest prospect T
Quote
...three days.. solo ritual of meeting the Great Spirit in the exquisite beauty of a sacred land ... the vision seekers will be camping alone surrounded only by nature and the Great Spirit ...
The “in the nature” activities will be held in a ranch nearby. While accommodations in the village are charming, nice and comfortable, the “ranch” is –for the most part- just a magical piece of land amongst the forces of nature, in the way to the top of the sacred mountain.... This enchanting village is small, quiet, has little cars activity; nice accommodations and charming restaurants and cafes; it is the perfect place to connect with your own soul and with what is eternal.
testimonies of satisfied customers:
Quote
He is treated by [the locals] as a friend and intimate traveler in places that would be otherwise unknown and unavailable to all but a handful of visitors.
locals welcome the guide who brings rich tourists... haalo globalization! bye-bye local tradisions!

but THIS tourist-guide offers - alongside a oracle and instant mastery of the "double" - afree-lance don-juan service!
Quote
Private Work
Private work with Victor Sanchez is an exceptional opportunity for those with enough personal resources, such as personal energy, financial independence and time availability, required to get involved in an intensive and very personal work on a one on one setting. It may be done by phone, email, or in person in Mexico or anywhere in the world.
he's just like the mexican  who offered casta (in "tales of infinity"?) to find don juan for him! or is he that scoundrel indeed?
Quote
"dirty sanchez"
...
this blast was tough, Mr x, or Mr g, or Mr y! it hunts me to this day!
no, i avoid the link to urban dictionary...
i like to think i'm tough... i am... but not THAT kind of tough! i'm not, and i'll never be! cursed is the dirt!
___________________________
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 02 February 2015 08:22:49 AM
hello mr j,

that is weird, why would he obsess over his shamans but not let them speak. maybe to gatekeep ?

the extremely friendly wikipedia entry on sanchez suggest he is similiar to ruiz. sort of true but not quite.

if the nazgal formula was plotted as an data graph, it would be casta as center point, then in an spiral outwards, based on significant data points, kenneth feather, sanchez, then ruiz. sanchez being much closer to feather by far.* feather and sanch being the closest to pro casta there was. feather being way more pro. fading into the casta based but not hardcore ruiz.**

sanchez isnt more annoying than any other toltec. it is an bit annoying, i admit, that of all the many thing in the world that i could of become an expert in, i know about toltecs at all. i could of become and expert at touching the maximum amount of boobs, but dam, toltecs, the least they could do is not be idiots.

i also admit i will first look at pirating the Prechtel book based on the fact i probably wont read all of it. if he is not popluar enough to be pirated then i guess i will buy it. he sounds like an ass, but

"we are all scoundrels"

agreed. we are also scamps.

mr x.

ps. for note, i have never bought and sanchez book, i just have some from and pile of stuff i inherited and few years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZW15uCKGw8

* there would also be an seperate but mirror like graph, yada yada yada, clear green. i dont know what would be the next plot point on that graph, but there would be one.

**just for note there are lots of curiosities in that fade.

ppss.

ms z, you are tough. thanks for the tourist and customer insight.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 06 February 2015 09:39:56 AM
Well it could be understandable, just, if you are not familiar with Prechtel, because his Guatamalan Maya training is a bit far away.  But it puts your expertise under the spotlight.  Have you read Pinkson?

Quote
True account of a decade-long apprenticeship with Huichol shamans in the Mexican Sierra Madre

• Contains an insider’s view of the Huichol’s shamanic spiritual practices, including their ritual use of peyote

• Offers the Huichol path to sustainable healing for individuals and our planet

Never conquered by Europeans, the Huichol--known for their use of peyote in spiritual ceremonies--have thoroughly retained their ancient way of life. Growing from a deeply rooted respect and reverence for the natural world, the Huichol’s shamanic spiritual practices focus on living life in harmony with all living things and offer a path to a truly sustainable future.

The Shamanic Wisdom of the Huichol is the autobiographical account of Pinkson’s decade-long immersion in the shamanic traditions of the Huichol tribes of the Sierra Madre in Mexico. From his first Huichol pilgrimage to Wiricuta (their sacred homeland) in 1981 to searching the desert for the heart medicine of peyote, Pinkson’s account of his initiation into the medicine teachings of the Huichol brings new life to this ancient eco-centric tradition. Providing a guiding light for those who seek to become part of the solution to our planet’s ecological challenges, Pinkson empowers readers to choose their own path toward healing both on a personal and a planetary level.

That should be right up your street and if you are not already familiar with it then I begin to think that your much vaunted expertise in this kind of thing is mythical.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 06 February 2015 04:07:15 PM
hello mr j,

please, what on earth.

i experience sympathetical embarrasment when people associate casta with mexican indians or peyote. embarassing because it so dumb and short sighted, like the video you posted with the guy who mentioned casta. nobody who makes those associations is and toltexpert.

for starters, i am an self proclaimed toltexpert, not knowing about pretchtel or pinkson means nothing to that status. you dont know about feather or mares or many others (real actual people who operate under the banner of "toltec" who actually really have effected real peoples live in culty ways, and continue to really do so, really). is there an reason why some unrated persons Guatamalan Maya training would change my mind.

"the Huichol’s shamanic spiritual practices focus on living life in harmony with all living things and offer a path to a truly sustainable future"

the hoochies can live in harmony with daesh. well done.

"the heart medicine"

also know as the super tripping super trip.

"Pinkson’s account of his initiation into the medicine teachings "

initiation into the super trip. or. medicine teachings.

" Providing a guiding light for those who seek to become part of the solution to our planet’s ecological challenges"

yep, totally solutioning the planets problems. have you heard, gay marriage causes extreme weather. totally beliefable the hoochies are solving that with spirit love. it takes more than shamans and peyote mentions to debunk or support casta.

i like the tone of that post, the "ha i got you, you not toltexpert". yet you didnt get me and now i am embaressed for both of us. if you think mention of pretchel or pinkman "gets me", you are dreaming.

(this is actually and really tricky point to lay out but) casta and the "toltecs" he spawned have nothing to do with peyote or easily accessabile mexican traditons. even from debunker point of view.

"Offers the Huichol path to sustainable healing for individuals and our planet"

pffft. really. please tell me, what is sustainable healing. really, please do. i would love to know how that translates to real world realness.

while you are at it, tell me about the mexican super traditions and meanings that spawned castas dj. why did castas dj not give a fuck about regular super mexicans ?

mr x.

ps.
as we have established mr j, you hold some strong new age views. i would also suggest as and side topic we look into those. i promise i will try to not be an ass, but what you belif in, why you belief in that in particular, and what happened in you life that led you to belief that would be interested as and topic. if you state those ideas clearly and carefully, it is entirely possible g, m, t and z would agree with you.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 06 February 2015 07:09:39 PM
No, that seems unlikely to me. I am also embarrassed that it's clear I have nothing useful to add to this discussion. I also think it's wise to put a blanket call of "probable nonsense" on anything mysteriously native american or oriental, but then, how would I know? I am embarrassed that J had been telling me that I'm talking nonsense now for years and I was too stupid to understand his code. I'm embarrassed that this is the one outlet I have for speculating about the "supernatural", and therefore it seems to you that I'm kooky. My position is at the fence, not on it. I think that's a perfectly sensible place to be. My belief in something like "God" is irrational, but I function better with it than without it. I have no idea how something like that would work, and I'm not about to impose my irrational beliefs on anyone else.

Yada yada yada, peace on earth.

Your friend,

G.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 06 February 2015 07:54:07 PM
hello mr g,

it is funny, you did add useful comments to the discussion. probable nonesense is and nice blanket, we should apply it to all. how would one know is and good starting point.

mr j has an code ? intriguing.

dont be embarassed about this outlet, we are pretty lucky here, this small group. arguing about toltexpertism (twist - mr j is and toltexpert too) is and dead end street, it is on the same level as arguing about klingon grammer. i dont post anywhere else so this is also my one stop place.

i dont think you are kooky. i think merlin is kooky. the idea of exploring supernatural ideas is way more exiciting than speaking klingon.

i find it interesting your feeling of "god". i dont feel that but that is also interesting. (just because i dont feel it doesnt mean its not there yada yada.) talking about it here is definatley not imposing it, so why not.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 07 February 2015 12:49:24 PM
Hi again Mr X, thanks for asking me about beliefs but at this point in time I feel it would make more sense to mention what I *don't* believe than what I *do* believe ...

The thing is, somehow I just don't actually believe that you are any kind of expert really in toltecism.

Granted I may be wrong.  And, if I'm right, why you are pretending to be an expert is an unsolved mystery.

Anyway, surely better to say what I think.

I'm not asking you to prove you're an expert (but if that's what you want to do, by all means go ahead!) and ultimately whether I think you're an expert or not really doesn't matter at all

i'ts just that having this conversation is increasingly ridiculous without some clearing of the ground.

Cheers!
j
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 07 February 2015 05:16:10 PM
mr j,

i dont have time for and full post right now. but do you see the conundrum.

to say i an and not and  toltexpert is to say you are and toltexpert.  how could you tell if i was and expert if you were not an experpt yourn self.

i agree about ridiculouus levels being too high, yet you think the clearing of the ground doesnt include youre self. what you dont belief in is all well and good. i directly ask what you do beleif in.


mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 08 February 2015 01:12:58 PM
I think it's quite likely that Castaneda's character don Juan was based on a real person.  Is that a belief or an opinion?  It depends on what you mean by belief.

For many people, a belief does not count as a belief unless it is held with pretty much 100% certainty.  At least, that is the Christian ... or, more generally, Semitic ... ideal.

As against that, there is the Hindu or Buddhist ... or Daoist ... or, more generally, Asian ... tendency to view the whole idea of having beliefs as being childish misconstrual of the nature of reality.  I think many Europeans and Americans would be quite surprised to discover the extent to which Easterners think Westerners are childish.

I was startled to read recently that belief is a talent which needs to be cultivated.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 08 February 2015 05:49:11 PM
gents - peasants - scoundrels - selfxperts - please!

for peace and joy sake, i recommend you try the white queen's method - beliefing *7* impossible things before breakfast!
though this days the number seems to grow exponentially...

gay marriage changes the whether?
a good one to begin with! :o

so, Mr X, how come?  ;??? ;??? i also don't think gay marriage is a healthy thing - not for the children they are allowed to adopt, that is - but where does the whether comes into the big picture?

let me go back to sancho pancho - i mean, sanchez: we covered touristic and customer experiences, but, alas, neglected the spiritual!
from a interview with Jordan Gruber, 1998:
http://www.enlightenment.com/media/interviews/sanchez.html (http://www.enlightenment.com/media/interviews/sanchez.html)
Quote
E.com: [casta] seems to be very interested in kind of immortality, being able to "run around the Eagle". you seem more interested in helping people to generally get more freedom and in also supporting the native peoples and the Toltecs in continuing their traditions. He seemed so focused on immortality for his little group, and you seem to have a much broader perspective. Is that true?
Sanchez: You are describing it so well ... One of the basic differences is that the Toltec knowledge includes as many people as possible; every little being, everything we relate to, should be included in what we are doing, in the sense that we are all connected with the rest of the people and things living around us.

In this sense, Castaneda's proposals seem to me very restricted. When you get to the point when there is a single group of maybe 16 people led by a Nagual, who are undertaking the task of looking for freedom, you are talking about something that is really far from what ordinary people are living.
...
when we are trying to see our spiritual leader like somebody who is living up in the clouds, with no connection to the material world, then we are wrong.

E.com. They are just people.

Sanchez: Of course. There has been a very strong lesson in the things that happened in the last years of Castaneda. It shows us that when we put a person on some spiritual level beyond human mistakes ... not only is the person a human person, but the sacred and the mundane are always mixed.

E.com: The sacred and mundane are one.

Sanchez: ... If we ... expect the perfect and pure masters we find in books, then it will be very difficult for us as individuals to really have a glimpse of what the look
 for freedom or the look for knowledge could be in the real world. ...
So, this news about Castaneda's interest in economic affairs, in business, and his having problems with his former wife or whatever, ... show us that the man had flaws and that not everything was so perfect with him. This could be understand as a criticism. But ... he was a man like anyone else dealing with problems: business problems, affection problems, family problems ...
E.com: ... Health problems ...

Sanchez: Yes. If we can accept this, then we can understand [that] he was really -- mainly in his earlier works -- really touching spirit.
...
We're never going to be perfect, and that's not the goal anyway, that's just an image in our minds
(toltexperts, does dirty sancho deserve dj answer to  casta saying "i'm just a human being?") 

so - Sancho's goals:
1.to help everyone and every little thing "generally get more freedom".
2. to help Toltecs keep their traditions.
while castas:
to take maybe 16 individuals into a special/weird kind of immortality.

toltexpert and toltexpert, what do you say?
is sancho right about castas' being so "restricted"?

and why doesn't he let sancho, if not join the party to immortality - at least  obese on him as well?

i'm no toltexpert, but imo -
1. flooding an area with tourists maybe help some locals obese, but is totally destructive to local traditions.
and
2. restricted is good. i don't want to have anything to do with sancho - or with daesh - i would like to see them disintegrating and ceasing to exist, on a individual, planetary and multi-universal level.

and as for dirty sancho - funny, he reminds me so much of a dream character i met many years ago... looking at his pic increased that impression, though he doesn't actually looks alike that DC - he replaced dj, who looked genuine earlier in that dream and inspired me fly in circles. then i was back down, talking to dj, and at some moment realized - he was too simple to be dj, he didn't know who casta was when i mentioned him and i thought - "this is not casta's dj. but he is such a nice old man, i'm so pleased i went with him to south america!"
replace "nice" with "dirty"- wala!
+he reminds me more then ever that mexican who squeezed casta vainly promising to show him where dj leaved. could he possibly be really the same person? myth or fiction? or fact?
 the interviewer... smells like s r debunkers', that according to that un-famous thread at The Hat, have some common roots with Scientology.which has its roots in "combination of mundain and secred" - replace "mundain" with hienous... wala! Crowly.
 
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 09 February 2015 03:23:17 PM
hello mr j,

mr g put it very well, beings near the fence but not on it, i liked that.

it seems to be the difference with our levels of toltecperticm.

as and person who subscribes to the casta got it all from books theory, i think toltecs are an invention of casta, as such i am well versed in the people casta spawned. i can say cool things like "the biggest sign that pretchel and pinkman are not relevant is because i have never heard of them". the only real mystery and point of interest left for me is the full information about missing details, such as the death of the witches and the remaining plot points. (very annoying as unlike graph 1, plot points on graph 2 are defined by the distinct lack of information)

you are on the other type, sanchezes wirririka or huchis are interesting because if there was and informant, there is and chance of traces left in similiar cultures. pretchel and pinkman are relevant. it is worth continuing to look and search.  that makes sense from your point of view.
(and i do question the value of such cultures if they cant modernize)

even being toltexerpts, the fence alone can divide us very strongly.

while i like to use sarcasm and hyperbole, and sometimes i think it obvious i am doing so, it is still amusing that i can say self depreciating humour such as

"it is needed to maintain my status as and self proclaimed debunker toltexpert hobbyist"

and be taken seriously.

mr j,  i ddint expect we would get into the beliefs asians have about what they dont belief in, but i did find that interested.

i already knew what your beliefpinion of casta was. i guess it is and stupidley broad question. asking what someone beliefs would be perhaps better said as and survey.

i was wondering more general things. when new agers talk about energy bodies and chakras and meridians, do you agree with them. what do think happens when we die. do you belief in some type of god. yes or no - ghosts, bigfoot, aliems.

when i was reading chapter 8, that week i happened to re read some book of five rings. contrasted to sanchez, concepts such as danger were very different. but still beleifs.

mr x.

ms z, i am just catching up with posting to mr j, i will have to get back to you. for now - gay marriage thing was and joke. i have read those dirtysanchez quotes. they are just and example of nazgulism. talking about dreams is not going to get much response here. that said you are doing well.

mr g, perhaps we need and general supernatural exploration thread. what do you think ?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr G on 10 February 2015 02:45:48 PM
That sounds good man, but you should do it.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 13 February 2015 04:34:34 PM
I think it's quite likely that Castaneda's character don Juan was based on a real person.  Is that a belief or an opinion?  It depends on what you mean by belief.

For many people, a belief does not count as a belief unless it is held with pretty much 100% certainty.  At least, that is the Christian ... or, more generally, Semitic ... ideal.

As against that, there is the Hindu or Buddhist ... or Daoist ... or, more generally, Asian ... tendency to view the whole idea of having beliefs as being childish misconstrual of the nature of reality.  I think many Europeans and Americans would be quite surprised to discover the extent to which Easterners think Westerners are childish.

I was startled to read recently that belief is a talent which needs to be cultivated.

hello mr j, just revisiting this post.

i am sure in the vatican there would be an high ranking cardinal who beliefs in what he does but he is not 100% certain. so he fill that gap with faith. but he is an beliefer.

what do we call and "belief" that is not 100% ? if not faith is it an hunch, informed or uninformed opnion, a feeling, i am asking you. what do we call the asian style belief without beliefing, for reference.

while we are generalizing billions of people per sentance, asians are also known for their astoundingly incredible abilitys to be rascist. which is pretty childish. asians love them some ghosts too in their beliefs. lots of them are muslims. maybe we could just say human beings are idiots and that is that.

that said, belief being and learned talent and the idea of not holding beliefs is interested. i have been thinking about it and there is something right there on the tip of my tounge, cant quite word it. and example of not belief information based knowledge is simple, we dont need to belief that fire hot, dont touch fire. the interested part is how far can that go, how far can not belief be taken.

for some people, habernaero hot, stop eating. for others habernaro good, keep eating. is that and difference of opinion or of non beleif.*
*not the best example, like i said, cant word it.

for note, i will be looking into pretechel and anythinge else you recommend. but it is and case of i wont have anything to say about that next week, more like next year, or the next.

50 years from now, when i am telling my grandkids tales from the ancient internet - castanet edition, i dont want them to ask "so did the leads from mr j go anywhere" and answer "i dont know, i never checked, i assumed i already knew everything."

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 19 February 2015 12:52:01 AM
Quote
talking about dreams is not going to get much response here.
what? art thou toltexpert sir?
it's like a shakespert would refuse to talk about  theater...
"RESPETABLE shaxperts pay attention to manuscripts - essays - dissertations - encyclopedias..."

dream is the toltec arena, mister, not comparative sancho-pancho toltecrature!

Quote
gay marriage thing was and joke.
oh how disapointed! such an revolutional result of your toltecresearch!
Quote
ms z, i am just catching up with posting to mr j, i will have to get back to you.
hmmm... are you behind the mirror, where you have to run with all your might in order to stay in the same place?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 20 February 2015 12:15:59 PM
 :D
Quote
Mr X: and example of not belief information based knowledge is simple, we dont need to belief that fire hot, dont touch fire. the interested part is how far can that go, how far can not belief be taken.

how far can it be taken. the question is: by whom?

there are horses and there are donkeys.
you can spur a horse to death - a donkey at some point won't move no matter what.

some (people, and others) you can spur to martyrdom, some not.
as the saying goes in my country - suckers do not die, they are merely replaced.


if we fall on our face, it's too evident to disbelief.
is this what you had on the top of your tongue, X?
no matter what! i'll tell aother dream. at age 10-11, after reading a novel about the spanish inquisiton, i dreamed: i'm taken to the torture cellar. they want me to deny my jewish belief - but i don't beleif in it anyway. (in reality i was raised on atheism.) they open the screen to reveal the instruments, to scare the interrogated (a procedure described in that book) - it is freaking scary indeed - and i'm thinking: "no, i won't take torture for a belief i don't belief in the first place! not more than 3 tortures anyway.."*
so was this horse-like or  donkey-like?
 
Quote
Ju4o: what do we call the asian style belief without beliefing, for reference.
make-belief?
Quote
Ju4o: I was startled to read recently that belief is a talent which needs to be cultivated.

 the classical non-toltex training again - the white queen's: (make?) believe in 7 impossible thing before breakfast.
 
another tequnique - a warrior's which is a strategist by (DJ's)definition:
"The primary thing when you take a sword in your hands is your intention to cut the enemy, whatever the means. Whenever you parry, hit, spring, strike or touch the enemy's cutting sword, you must cut the enemy in the same movement. It is essential to attain this. If you think only of hitting, springing, striking or touching the enemy, you will not be able actually to cut him.”
― Miyamoto Musashi, The Book of Five Rings

http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1318780 (http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1318780)[/url]
(he also said: “It is difficult to understand the universe if you only study one planet” )

Quote
I think many Europeans and Americans would be quite surprised to discover the extent to which Easterners think Westerners are childish.
not believing the make-believe - this is The Clap Of The One Hand?
better start training in early childhood...
http://reflectionsinthenight.com/mauri8-16-06.mp3

http://reflectionsinthenight.com/mauri8-16-06.mp3

*luckily, since i'm a female, this was just a dream for me... male  babies with jewish parents are not asked to take the first 3 tortures (Milah, Peri'ah and Metzitza - sucking) out of politeness... they are compalsed to. the rest  - pogroms, Holocaust and so forth  - is also usually not asked a politness... imo the issue jews have with torture and peculiar deaths is a direct cause of this basic jewish experience... a stupid conspiracy? unlike what Iluminaty and satan worshiperd are said to do to children - definitely not!  as someone wrote in comment to some on-line protest to chemtrails: "sounds like another crazy conspiracy... but remember, the holloucast also was a conspiracy - and today there are proves it  was reality."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNNNmsxRoE4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrYyxoFGMhQ

http://kofrim.bandcamp.com/album/the-far-end

Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 20 February 2015 01:29:32 PM
...when punishmet hit the marks...
some healing music is so very necessary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEAwgz8k3U&list=PLE18F0410E22D99F1&index=6 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEAwgz8k3U&list=PLE18F0410E22D99F1&index=6)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIXE-5NrC3o&list=PLE18F0410E22D99F1&index=7 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIXE-5NrC3o&list=PLE18F0410E22D99F1&index=7)

http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1741 (http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=1741)

the last link gives the same song with several videoes, all interesting. the last one - surprisingly happy audience - is my favorite.

here are the lyrics:
That's great, it starts with an earthquake
Birds and snakes, an aeroplane, Lenny Bruce is not afraid

​​Eye of a hurricane, listen to yourself churn
World serves its own needs, don't misserve your own needs
Feed it up a knock, speed, grunt, no, strength, no
Ladder, structure clatter with fear of height, down height
Wire in a fire, represent the seven games
In a government for hire and a combat site

Left her, wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies
Breathing down your neck
Team by team, reporters baffled, trump, tethered crop
Look at that low plane, fine then

Uh oh, overflow, population, common group
But it'll do, save yourself, serve yourself
World serves its own needs, listen to your heart bleed
Tell me with the rapture and the reverent in the right, right
You vitriolic, patriotic, slam, fight, bright light
Feeling pretty psyched

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

Six o'clock, TV hour, don't get caught in foreign tower
Slash and burn, return, listen to yourself churn
Lock him in uniform and book burning, blood letting
Every motive escalate, automotive incinerate

Light a candle, light a motive, step down, step down
Watch a heel crush, crush, uh oh, this means no fear
Cavalier, renegade and steer clear
A tournament, a tournament, a tournament of lies
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives and I decline

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine, I feel fine

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

The other night I tripped a nice continental drift divide
Mount St. Edelite, Leonard Bernstein
Leonid Breshnev, Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs
Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom
You symbiotic, patriotic, slam but neck, right? Right

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
It's the end of the world as we know it
And I feel fine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZNqs0YgWkM#t=265
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Merlin on 21 February 2015 07:43:06 PM
Like the pan pipes.

http://youtu.be/Xqb18bqNtEw?t=2m40s
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: ju4o on 22 February 2015 07:00:56 PM
Quote
while we are generalizing billions of people per sentance,

Well I'll just mention that we are not the first to generalize.  For an example from the champion of outrageous generalization look no further than Matthew Arnold's explanation of how Eastern Quietism led directly to the French Revolution.

Quote
   "The East bow'd low before the blast
In patient, deep disdain;
She let the legions thunder past,
And plunged in thought again.

   "So well she mused, a morning broke
Across her spirit grey;
A conquering, new-born joy awoke,
And fill'd her life with day.

   "'Poor world,' she cried, 'so deep accurst,
That runn'st from pole to pole
To seek a draught to slake thy thirstù
Go, seek it in thy soul!'

   "She heard it, the victorious West,
In crown and sword array'd!
She felt the void which mined her breast,
She shiver'd and obey'd.

[...]

   "And oh, we cried, that on this corse
Might fall a freshening storm!
Rive its dry bones, and with new force
A new-sprung world inform!

   "Down came the storm! O'er France it pass'd
In sheets of scathing fire;
All Europe felt that fiery blast,
And shook as it rush'd by her."

I like to think this is a generalization-friendly forum.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 23 February 2015 02:34:56 PM
does this stretch the definition of sinchro, ju4?
or is it... hmm... a dirk gently style one?

Sonnet to the Hungarian Nation
1849

NOT in sunk Spain’s prolong’d death agony;   
Not in rich England, bent but to make pour   
The flood of the world’s commerce on her shore;   
Not in that madhouse, France, from whence the cry   
Afflicts grave Heaven with its long senseless roar;           5
Not in American vulgarity,   
Nor wordy German imbecility—   
Lies any hope of heroism more.   
Hungarians! Save the world! Renew the stories   
Of men who against hope repell’d the chain,           10
And make the world’s dead spirit leap again!   
On land renew that Greek exploit, whose glories   
Hallow the Salaminian promontories,   
And the Armada flung to the fierce main.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 24 February 2015 01:48:45 PM
hello mr j,

yes, from the last two things i posted in this thread, that half sentance was the only thing that could be gleaned for conversation. i dont mind but i am not sure how conversation works if that is the case.

how far can it be taken, ms z ? how far could we chain together basic concepts that dont involve belief. could we string enough ideas to simulate an person who doesnt belief in anything, but can function like and normal human. probably not, not even an asian.

why would we explore toltec dream magic when we are still talking about wether or not toltecs even exist. i know who you are from castanet and i know youre story. i strongly reccommend you continue to learn english and practice speaking in and more reserved manner.

five rings, maiden, emi, all good. just chill out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY

for merlin and ms z, and oldie but a goody.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BybTNK9HwWE

mr x.
ps. nice tupe merlin, was that you singing at the end ?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 24 February 2015 10:17:53 PM
Quote
Mr X: the only real mystery and point of interest left for me is the full information about missing details, such as the death of the witches and the remaining plot points. (very annoying as unlike graph 1, plot points on graph 2 are defined by the distinct lack of information)
what with the graphs you never painted, self-proclaimed debunker toltexpert hobbyist?
Quote
yes, from the last two things i posted in this thread, that half sentance was the only thing that could be gleaned for conversation.

so did i catch-up my enter stage cue this time, Mr self-proclaimed great director hobbyst?

or did i miss the cue to make (bigger) fuss of your teasing, promising to get back to me once you catch up with  Merlin then  ignoring me?
next time just pm me "i want you to be very annoyed about my behaviour, and DO relate to the missing woman! i said "the death of!" why don't you jump? you know very well i know you think they are perfectly alive!" 

well - don't take it personally, i'm annoyed for a reason that has - well, MAY BE has nothing to do with you:
wrote a thorough reply to this post:(http://spiritualitydiscussiongroup.yuku.com/reply/7931/In-the-News-Vol-2#reply-7931 (http://spiritualitydiscussiongroup.yuku.com/reply/7931/In-the-News-Vol-2#reply-7931) (a sinchro? pun intended) and it was deleted.
why doesn't it appear misteriousely in this post, where you might think it belongs better?

Quote
how far can it be taken, ms z ? how far could we chain together basic concepts that dont involve belief. could we string enough ideas to simulate an person who doesnt belief in anything, but can function like and normal human. probably not, not even an asian.
you mean - are androids' dreams about electric sheep MAGICAL?
Quote
why would we explore toltec dream magic when we are still talking about wether or not toltecs even exist
what about your own dreams, mister? would toltex non\existance effect it's non\magicallity?
while toltecs are a dboubteful buisness, your own dreams - or' at list, mine - do exist for sure.
you can claim  as Mr worholl does on THAT site - they are but images, as magical as super heroes cartoons.
as you can claim - as gojeyewalker replied the talking brujo dog - 
that reality too, is unproved to be anything but images. BUT - images or whatever - I know MINE exist as YOU know YOUR do? do you?
need to sleep - in short: no reason to assume the witches are dead - no reason to intrude them. also, someones dreamed them alive. also, when i disappeared (for over a year "only") my mom wanted to have the police investigate, my dad blocked her for i acted too much in accord with his training as a Stern-Gang member, though later, after i contacted him following my son's birth, he told me "but it's impossible - what is there left to fight for?"
edit: for this, i.e. blocking my mom for once, a real rare occasion during their lives, and avoiding investigation,  i was grateful to him to his last  day.  and i still am.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 26 February 2015 01:23:53 PM
what with the graphs you never painted, self-proclaimed debunker toltexpert hobbyist?

yes the unpainted graphs are the interesting part.

so did i catch-up my enter stage cue this time, Mr self-proclaimed great director hobbyst?

not yet.

or did i miss the cue to make (bigger) fuss of your teasing, promising to get back to me once you catch up with  Merlin then  ignoring me?

if you are and warrior losing self importance, why would it matter to you if i dont get back to you. why do you want my attention. 

i have nothing to do with the hat, if you have and problem there you should deal with it there. if you have something to say about the witches, nobody is stopping you from saying it here, but as you type the post, check yourself by thinking "would sid or sill post this?"

you mean - are androids' dreams about electric sheep MAGICAL?

no. that is not what i meant. it is unlikely we could simulate and functional person without them beliefing in something.

my favourite dream, twice in the past 6 months, is being really tired, asleep and dreaming, and watching my brain just give up and stop producing content. like the dream slows down, broken record skipping for and bit, then settles on and still image for the rest of sleep. if there was an pill to take that stops dreams and just lets you sleep casually, i would take it.

i will get back to you ms z.
i think you should converse more with mr j.
it is not that he made and clumsy and cruel attempt to gain access to some hat stuff, showing his disrespect for forum4 in the process.
he brought you here to this forum, he thought you have something to say and that you will fit in here, he is intereseted in what you have to say. he must just be shy. you two should talk. once you have i will know "whats up" and get back to you.

mr x.
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 03 March 2015 10:39:09 AM
X
if you are and warrior losing self importance, why would it matter to you if i dont get back to you. why do you want my attention.
mr x.
OK - [non-existent/maybe-existent]warriors are supposed to sit alone in the darkness as long as necessary - BUT NOT otherwise.
warriors are wonderful people who need people.
a baby warrior needs parents. as they grows, warrior needs friends,  spouses, ofsprings, even a nagual!
 in one word - LOVE. others to love and be loved by,+ FAITHFULNESS. in fire and water.
that said, i return to sit alone in the darkness...
or mabe not - at least i'll address Jufo as you suggested

Ju4o
X claims you're shy - are thou? or are you (plural) pulling a prank on me? G (where's he?) advising me to release... what? crumbles slowly so X won't bun me again; now X saying you are waitiny for me to release some crumble of info for you're shy, and makes it a condition for his  attention.

could you possibly give me the legend of rules to your [petty?]games?

it never occured to me you might be shy, jufour! or how's your name to be pronounced?
anyway -
if you want my opinion, or experience, or amotion, or support, or stating limits, whatever, on whatever - you are very warmly invited to ask! i promise, i'll answer with my  naturally warm attitude. no need to flinch or shy away from me! (as so many do...)

Quote
ju4o: I don't know anything about Theun Mares and when I google on the name it says "This site may be hacked" and

Quote
You'll see the message "This site may be hacked" when we believe a website may have been hacked. The hacker may have changed some of the existing pages on the site, or added new spam pages. If you visit the site, you may be redirected to spam or malware.

We recommend that you don't visit the website until this message disappears from the search result.

yes.
you know? like Theum mare's, my stuff on-line was often modified in wierd ways, then sometimes come back to virginity... you never know. for years i was getting mad, being unable to get it merely aknowleged by anyone.
no one was entering mt web pages anyway, thus no one witnessed the to and fro modifications.
 well, probably everyone found my stuff boring, or at least uninteresting, as you say about theun mares:
Quote
ju4o:Well, if he is saying that his training is based solely on memories recovered from previous lifetimes, how can it be of any interest? 
like mares, my knowledge as well as my  "fantasy" (wrote even a book containing both) are based on past-life memories.

so how can such a bull be interesting?
maybe if i kept claiming it's my prolific imagination...
it's like telling a guy you love him too early. it can cause him run away. true and tried.

ju4o?

or did X  prank me you're shy?
and you just find me un-interesting, like the rest of the billions-per-sentence gang?*edit* - 
Quote
X: my favourite dream, twice in the past 6 months, is being really tired, asleep and dreaming, and watching my brain just give up and stop producing content. like the dream slows down, broken record skipping for and bit, then settles on and still image for the rest of sleep. if there was an pill to take that stops dreams and just lets you sleep casually, i would take it.
???
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: tally-ho! on 24 June 2015 12:44:01 PM
Fantastic4

last night i gave up in the middle answering PG registered on The Hat - realized i was too tired to overcome the tech probs.. (i think first time this happend...)

in the morning it was still harsh, like in  The Good Days, since i was dog-[the 1st] fighting on SR, with enough  "technical problems" to turn any beliefer into Paranoid.

once i clicked "send" - got yuku's ugly notice  "we are having a brief Hickok..." meaning -deleted. forgot even to save a copy (made a mental notice-to myself while the same happened repeatedly on trying to edit  "yonatan (dream name)". 
to work! i'll reconstruct it here.

i meant to put a link here anyway, but i wouldn't quote, after PG t
PMed me that he wan't post here.
but under the circumstances - enough is enough.

sorry, PG. hope i don't cause you too much trouble...

` `` ``` ````` ``````` ``` ` ` ``` ` ` ` ````` ` `` ``` ``reply to PG``` ``` `` ` ` ` ` ` ````````````` ``` `` ` ` ` `
Quote
PG REGISTERED VERSION wrote:
________________________________________
The Wu-guy went further


what, is he back ?
i have to open incognito window to visit there you know - and they (Incognitos Anonymous) tend to not load the page... so sometimes  i give up.
I go there more often than "few times a year" as funnily 2 different persons (unless... you never know with nicks who are who...) suggested (about 2 different boards) recently - i am still banned over there, and like it. Good to stay officially out of the legal reaches of Evil!
 there was time i was preaching: "boycott SR!" and lo and behold - it seems they got self-boycotted or something...
`````
Quote
`But he seem to think his technique is revolutionary. It says basically: Put yourself in a situation of danger by force of Nature. He seem to imply he has donin a just that many, many times. You know... Riding 20ft waves, being next to an exploding Vulcano, things like that. The guy is definitely an out-door-man.```
very good method, imo. It's "the mood of the warrior" thing. used it myself, though my performances are quite restricted. I can call for a wind to chase away musquitoes, or have my little boy ask politely a hurricane to keep away… or yell at a rapist "go away!" lol! … and such like.
Quote
The other guy ... doesn't care about dreaming anymore.
And this intrigues me also. Just the fact of remembering at the detail any of your dreams is a portentous happening in my personal experience... Now. Doing it by command!...Any night I want!.. I think Mr Worrell is underestimating his own talent... Or flatly lying.
It could be either. Even he can agree on that, if he's to be honest.
lol only fair to put them under theit own jugdment (your'e lying!) once and for all...
Quote
S.R. very well might be a place where people who finds the myth portrayed in Carlos Castaneda books to be something at least in the field of possibilities, would come and be taught about how what they believe is all B.S. How this and that piece of info takes down the whole thing

this basic time-bomb was carefully overlooked a lot over forum4 (I find their chew  more juicy) -
for example:
http://www.for example:forum4.org/index.php?topic=36.0 (http://www.for example:forum4.org/index.php?topic=36.0)

Quote
For example, here is an explanation of why Castaneda went off the rails soon after don Juan died
The explanation is that he went off the rails because don Juan died.

Succinct and compelling.  In my opinion of course.  And, as you say, that is if don Juan existed in the first place.

Quote
and be easily de-programmed. People like me, for an instance.
What do you mean by "de-programmed", PG registered user?
Quote
… they were playing Nagual-and-Scouts very well into the 80-90's
.
Rofel! You must be paraphrasing a phrase by me? but I don't remember when and where.
Quote
Then, I had the opportunity to make some questions in SR to Ms Wallace Well... Learning of her selling her house to buy another closer to that of the so-called witches!... Oh, man... I found that freakingly revealing!
Revaling what? Not a gay connection again?
s it in amy's forum? can you provide a link?i?
Quote
Mammishian's book?... That pompous writing barely aims to convince of anything to anyone!  Although I found the candid honesty of the stories very amusing... You know... Their Hallowin costumes...And filming covered in a white sheet... White camo for a white wall, ha!... Oh, well... And Mr Mammishian up a pole with his camera filming the women in a Mall?...

What are you implying – that the man's secret mission was to infect carlos with cancer? I am not a doctor, but cancer is un-contagious, according to western medicine cannon?
Quote
  Oh...  and when they are catched with the hands on the garbage!... Oh, man. Great reading!... I have to confess now in retrospect.
Great? fumbling someone's garbage to, so to speak, make a woodoo,  stick?

KILLING!
MURDEROUS!
Quote
But they didn't convinced me of anything either.
And now this pair? ...  It has be a joke!
Is that all?

Is that all?

pss - can someone put a link there to my answer?

tosk can - but he's so busy. nyone else volunteers? or are tosk and me the only ones who can take lightly such operation?
Title: Re: sustained re action
Post by: Mr X on 10 November 2015 09:34:28 AM
hello,

so i was waiting around for something, got bored, and looked up good old cleargreen.

found this on their home page. pretty funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbZteV6vpaM

my commentary is -
lol

mr x.